• About Us
  • Contributors
  • Guides
  • Speaking Engagements
  • Write for The SEM Post
  • Submit a tip or contact us!
  • Newsletters

The SEM Post

Latest News About SEO, SEM, PPC & Search Engines

  • Google
  • SEO
  • Mobile
  • Local
  • Bing
  • Pay Per Click
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • State of the Industry
You are here: Home / Google / Google Clarifies Sitelinks Search Box Usage in Search Results

Google Clarifies Sitelinks Search Box Usage in Search Results

September 9, 2014 at 4:30 am PST By Jennifer Slegg

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
  • WhatsApp
  • Evernote
  • SMS

sitelinks search 1

When Google added the new search box in sitelinks within the Google search results, there were certainly many questions about the new feature.  Was it guaranteed to display if a webmaster sets it up?  Would it only display for certain queries that would lead Google to believe that additional site: search would be warranted?  Or was it something that would only show up for the top brands or companies?

Pierre Far, a Google Webmaster Trends Analyst jumped on Google+ to clarify some misconceptions and questions that webmasters were asking.

I’ve seen a few questions around the new sitelinks search box we announced last week, and all these questions made me misread (and want to clarify) a point I saw on the The Next Web coverage[1]. The question is: would adding the schema.org markup guarantee a site getting the search box?

The answer is no. It’s a bit more nuanced (and clever) than that.

Taking a step back, many webmasters consider adding a search feature to their sites as they grow. Different sites would need the site-specific search at different times for different considerations and there isn’t a hard point that immediately decides yes/no. We try to reflect that nuance in our algos and that’s why we’ve designed them to look at many signals about relating to both the site and the specific query the site is being shown for while deciding whether to show the search box.

This means you should add the markup if you have a site-specific search so that when the algos find enough support to show it, the search points to your site’s search feature.

Bonus question on my previous G+ thread: Will adding a tracking parameter to URL pattern upset this at all?

Answer: not at all! But, as you’re adding more complexity to your URL pattern, double and triple check it works correctly.

[0] https://plus.google.com/u/0/+PierreFar/posts/YytRv3nJ7nr
[1] http://thenextweb.com/google/2014/09/05/google-makes-site-specific-search-prominent-adds-autocomplete-support-sites-search-pages/

Barry Schwartz also asked whether you needed the schema to get the sitelink search box.

+Pierre Far I also assume you don’t need the schema to get the sitelink searchbox either – just to have it redirect to your own site (if Google gives you the box).  Right?

Far confirms there are two deciding factors that go into the sitelinks search box.

That’s right +Barry Schwartz. Roughly, you can think of it as two parts:

1. Whether our algos think a search box is needed
2. If so, where to point the search

If you don’t want Google to send the search queries to your site, you can simply skip adding the markup and users will be directed to Google site: queries.

Unless there is a specific reason where you might not want to show site search, it is probably something most webmasters want to set up, even if Google chooses not to display it for your site at this time.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
  • WhatsApp
  • Evernote
  • SMS
The following two tabs change content below.
  • Bio
  • Latest Posts
My Twitter profileMy Facebook profileMy Google+ profileMy LinkedIn profile

Jennifer Slegg

Founder & Editor at The SEM Post
Jennifer Slegg is a longtime speaker and expert in search engine marketing, working in the industry for almost 20 years. When she isn't sitting at her desk writing and working, she can be found grabbing a latte at her local Starbucks or planning her next trip to Disneyland. She regularly speaks at Pubcon, SMX, State of Search, Brighton SEO and more, and has been presenting at conferences for over a decade.
My Twitter profileMy Facebook profileMy Google+ profileMy LinkedIn profile

Latest posts by Jennifer Slegg (see all)

  • 2022 Update for Google Quality Rater Guidelines – Big YMYL Updates - August 1, 2022
  • Google Quality Rater Guidelines: The Low Quality 2021 Update - October 19, 2021
  • Rethinking Affiliate Sites With Google’s Product Review Update - April 23, 2021
  • New Google Quality Rater Guidelines, Update Adds Emphasis on Needs Met - October 16, 2020
  • Google Updates Experiment Statistics for Quality Raters - October 6, 2020

Filed Under: Google, SEO Tagged With: Sitelinks

Sign up for our newsletter


Trackbacks

  1. Google Introduces New Search Box Within Sitelinks in Search Results - The SEM Post says:
    September 14, 2014 at 3:42 am

    […] Added: Google Clarifies Sitelinks Search Box Usage in Search Results […]

Founder & Editor

Jennifer Slegg (2052)

Sign up for our daily news recap & weekly newsletter.


Follow us online

  • Facebook
  • Google+
  • Linkedin
  • Pinterest
  • Twitter

Latest News

2022 Update for Google Quality Rater Guidelines – Big YMYL Updates

We finally have the first Google Quality Rater Guidelines update of 2022, and like usual, it is … [Read More...]

Recent Posts

  • 2022 Update for Google Quality Rater Guidelines – Big YMYL Updates
  • Google Quality Rater Guidelines: The Low Quality 2021 Update
  • Rethinking Affiliate Sites With Google’s Product Review Update
  • New Google Quality Rater Guidelines, Update Adds Emphasis on Needs Met
  • Google Updates Experiment Statistics for Quality Raters
  • Analyzing “How Google Search Works” Changes from Google
  • Google Quality Rater Guidelines Update: New Introduction, Rater Bias & Political Affiliations
  • Google Updates Quality Rater Guidelines: Reputation for News Sites; Video Content Updates; Quality for Information Sites
  • Google Makes Major Changes to NoFollow, Adds Sponsored & UGC Tags
  • Google Updates Quality Rater Guidelines Targeting E-A-T, Page Quality & Interstitials

Categories

  • Affiliate Marketing
  • Amazon
  • Apple
  • Bing
  • Branding
  • Browsers
  • Chrome
  • Content Marketing
  • Design
  • Domains
  • DuckDuckGo
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Firefox
  • Foursquare
  • Google
    • Analytics
    • Google RankBrain
    • Quality Rater's Guidelines
  • History of Search
  • Industry Spotlight
  • Instagram
  • Internet Explorer
  • Links
  • Local
  • Mobile
  • Native Advertising
  • Other Search Engines
  • Pay Per Click
  • Pinterest
  • Publishers
  • Security
  • SEO
  • Snapchat
  • Social Media
  • State of the Industry
  • The SEM Post
  • Tools
  • Twitter
  • Uncategorized
  • User Experience
  • Video Marketing
  • Week in Review
  • Whitepapers
  • Wordpress
  • Yahoo
  • Yelp
  • YouTube
December 2025
MTWTFSS
« Aug  
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031 

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org

Copyright © 2025 · News Pro Theme On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in