• About Us
  • Contributors
  • Guides
  • Speaking Engagements
  • Write for The SEM Post
  • Submit a tip or contact us!
  • Newsletters

The SEM Post

Latest News About SEO, SEM, PPC & Search Engines

  • Google
  • SEO
  • Mobile
  • Local
  • Bing
  • Pay Per Click
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • State of the Industry
You are here: Home / Google / Germany Wants Google to Disclose Search Algorithm

Germany Wants Google to Disclose Search Algorithm

September 17, 2014 at 4:20 am PST By Jennifer Slegg

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
  • WhatsApp
  • Evernote
  • SMS

google deOne of the reasons Google is so successful is that their search algorithm does a pretty good job at ranking sites and keeping out the spam.  However, if Google published the algorithm it would not only open the doors for competitors to copy their successful algorithm but also for spammers to reverse engineer it to make their spam sites rank at the top of the search results.

But German justice minister Heiko Maas wants Google to disclose their search algorithm in the name of transparency and consumer protection.

It comes from an interview Maas did with the Financial Times regarding the power Google has within the EU, while the interview is lengthy and worth the read, here is what pertains to the algorithm itself.

Q: Mathias Döpfner, chief executive of Axel Springer, has spoken of “fear of Google” – do you understand this fear?

We should not be afraid of Google, but as a state we have certain responsibilities. We know that Google covers about 95% of the search engine market. That is an exceptional market share. And we know, because we all use the internet, that whoever isn’t at the top of the search results virtually doesn’t exist – if I may exaggerate ever so slightly. I therefore believe that Google’s power over consumers and market operators is extraordinary. We have to think about what precautions are in place so that this power is not abused. This is what Mr Döpfner is concerned about. I believe competition should develop freely. With a market share of 95 per cent, Google dominates the search engine world, and is able to rank its search results in a manner apt to promote its own business interests. And that is not acceptable. We must think about how to solve this problem.

Q: What are the practical steps?

A: In the end it relates to how transparent the algorithms are that Google uses to rank its search results. When a search engine has such an impact on economic development, this is an issue we have to address. We advocate consistent application and enforcement of antitrust legislation at the domestic and European levels. As far as the state’s role is concerned, the competition authorities are responsible for assessing whether a company has a dominant position in a certain market and whether it is abusing that position. The European Commission is currently engaged in this process as part of its ongoing antitrust proceedings against Google. Of course, consumer protection must play a decisive role in this evaluation. We have made this very clear to the European Commission on numerous occasions.

Google would obviously fight to keep their search algorithm private, for both spam and competitive reasons.  Their algorithm is in essence a trade secret, and Google could claim it would cause irreparable harm if their algorithm was to be made public.  And that also doesn’t take into account the hundreds of algorithm changes Google tests and releases every year, as the algorithm is constantly evolving based upon new spam techniques and what Google wants to weight as a ranking factor.

 

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
  • WhatsApp
  • Evernote
  • SMS
The following two tabs change content below.
  • Bio
  • Latest Posts
My Twitter profileMy Facebook profileMy Google+ profileMy LinkedIn profile

Jennifer Slegg

Founder & Editor at The SEM Post
Jennifer Slegg is a longtime speaker and expert in search engine marketing, working in the industry for almost 20 years. When she isn't sitting at her desk writing and working, she can be found grabbing a latte at her local Starbucks or planning her next trip to Disneyland. She regularly speaks at Pubcon, SMX, State of Search, Brighton SEO and more, and has been presenting at conferences for over a decade.
My Twitter profileMy Facebook profileMy Google+ profileMy LinkedIn profile

Latest posts by Jennifer Slegg (see all)

  • 2022 Update for Google Quality Rater Guidelines – Big YMYL Updates - August 1, 2022
  • Google Quality Rater Guidelines: The Low Quality 2021 Update - October 19, 2021
  • Rethinking Affiliate Sites With Google’s Product Review Update - April 23, 2021
  • New Google Quality Rater Guidelines, Update Adds Emphasis on Needs Met - October 16, 2020
  • Google Updates Experiment Statistics for Quality Raters - October 6, 2020

Filed Under: Google Tagged With: EU

Sign up for our newsletter


Comments

  1. Alan Bleiweiss says

    September 17, 2014 at 9:35 pm

    wow I could easily see that if they tried to force Google to do this, that Google would prefer to block access from Germany entirely just to avoid exposing their algorithms. Imagine that – overnight Google would be gone, and Bing would instantly be a critical system for SEOs to focus on.

    Not sure what would happen if this was also to happen at the EU level – the implications either way are massive…

  2. Rich Meek says

    October 9, 2014 at 3:42 am

    Why doesn’t Germany call in the other search engines link Bing and ask why they are so bad and kick them up the behind.

    Also why doesn’t Germany enforce all German government PCs must use Bing as Google cannot be trusted “Their Words”

Trackbacks

  1. Top SEO News From Around The Web: Sept 15-19 - Beanstalk's Internet Marketing Blog says:
    September 19, 2014 at 4:53 pm

    […] Read the full story > […]

Founder & Editor

Jennifer Slegg (2052)

Sign up for our daily news recap & weekly newsletter.


Follow us online

  • Facebook
  • Google+
  • Linkedin
  • Pinterest
  • Twitter

Latest News

2022 Update for Google Quality Rater Guidelines – Big YMYL Updates

We finally have the first Google Quality Rater Guidelines update of 2022, and like usual, it is … [Read More...]

Recent Posts

  • 2022 Update for Google Quality Rater Guidelines – Big YMYL Updates
  • Google Quality Rater Guidelines: The Low Quality 2021 Update
  • Rethinking Affiliate Sites With Google’s Product Review Update
  • New Google Quality Rater Guidelines, Update Adds Emphasis on Needs Met
  • Google Updates Experiment Statistics for Quality Raters
  • Analyzing “How Google Search Works” Changes from Google
  • Google Quality Rater Guidelines Update: New Introduction, Rater Bias & Political Affiliations
  • Google Updates Quality Rater Guidelines: Reputation for News Sites; Video Content Updates; Quality for Information Sites
  • Google Makes Major Changes to NoFollow, Adds Sponsored & UGC Tags
  • Google Updates Quality Rater Guidelines Targeting E-A-T, Page Quality & Interstitials

Categories

  • Affiliate Marketing
  • Amazon
  • Apple
  • Bing
  • Branding
  • Browsers
  • Chrome
  • Content Marketing
  • Design
  • Domains
  • DuckDuckGo
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Firefox
  • Foursquare
  • Google
    • Analytics
    • Google RankBrain
    • Quality Rater's Guidelines
  • History of Search
  • Industry Spotlight
  • Instagram
  • Internet Explorer
  • Links
  • Local
  • Mobile
  • Native Advertising
  • Other Search Engines
  • Pay Per Click
  • Pinterest
  • Publishers
  • Security
  • SEO
  • Snapchat
  • Social Media
  • State of the Industry
  • The SEM Post
  • Tools
  • Twitter
  • Uncategorized
  • User Experience
  • Video Marketing
  • Week in Review
  • Whitepapers
  • Wordpress
  • Yahoo
  • Yelp
  • YouTube
December 2025
MTWTFSS
« Aug  
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031 

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org

Copyright © 2025 · News Pro Theme On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in