• About Us
  • Contributors
  • Guides
  • Speaking Engagements
  • Write for The SEM Post
  • Submit a tip or contact us!
  • Newsletters

The SEM Post

Latest News About SEO, SEM, PPC & Search Engines

  • Google
  • SEO
  • Mobile
  • Local
  • Bing
  • Pay Per Click
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • State of the Industry
You are here: Home / Google / How User Experience & User Intent Affect Panda, Penguin & Other Google Algorithms

How User Experience & User Intent Affect Panda, Penguin & Other Google Algorithms

June 19, 2015 at 5:54 am PST By Sean Van Guilder

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
  • WhatsApp
  • Evernote
  • SMS

sean van guilder userWhen most people focus on SEO, they think purely in terms of how Google sees the on-page elements of a page and how they could potentially be impacted by one of the many Google algorithms.  But too often, SEOs are so focused on that aspect that they are forgetting two other areas that certainly play an important role on any page.

One of my soap box speeches, to anyone who will listen, is SEO Best Practices can be categorized as two primary categories: User Experience and User Intent. Many might say that I shouldn’t be simplifying such a vastly complex thing as search engine algorithms into simply two buckets.

Definitions

User Experience: According to Google’s answer card this is defined as “the overall experience of a person using a product such as a website or computer application, especially in terms of how easy or pleasing it is to use.”

User Intent: Can be defined as providing information for what a user is looking for when they conduct a query.

Let’s look at where the search engines have been going with their approach to ranking of website content, most notably Google but Bing definitely takes a similar approach

Mobile Friendly Update

A couple of months ago, Google rolled out mobile rankings algorithm that takes into account multiple ranking factors to determine if a website is mobile friendly. With the number of searches conducted on mobile devices surpassing desktop search, Google is looking at multiple criteria on a page-by-page basis.

User Experience:

  • Does the page display within the screen width?
  • Are hyperlinks too close together?
  • Do pages load under 1.4 seconds?
  • Font sizes are not too small

I believe the main thrust with the mobile friendly update centers around how well a website can be used by the searcher, i.e. causes the least amount of frustration.

Pigeon Update

In mid-2014, Google made a significant update to local search (the largest they have ever done) and moved their core search algorithm to be closely aligned with local cues.

User Intent:

  • Proximity of address to the Point of Search
  • Correct Name, address, phone number (NAP)
  • Reviews/Ratings for type of business or service

Hummingbird Update:

This entire update revolves around User Intent In 2013, Google made a major algorithm update that shifted to semantic search, also known as conversational search, is meant to deliver fast and precise answers. Search Engine Land’s FAQ provides the best example for this update:

  • A search for “pizza hut calories per slice” previously sent users to a non-Pizza Hut website. After the update the primary search send the user directly to Pizza Hut’s nutrition page.

Penguin/Page Layout Update

In 2012, Google made an update that penalized low quality websites that were over optimizing and spamming keywords on their websites. This update can be categorized as targeting user experience.

Another user experience update in the same year was the Page Layout algorithms to devalue sites with too much ad-space above the “fold”. Another user experience update.

Panda Update

In 2011, Google began penalizing websites with thin content, content farms, high number of ads versus content. This algorithm update has been updated many times over the past 4 years and is an example of how Google is looking at user experience. One could argue this blends into user intent as well.

So next time you are working on SEO for an overall site or just a single webpage, consider the impact of both user experience and user intent in your SEO strategy and don’t get caught up on the technical SEO alone.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
  • WhatsApp
  • Evernote
  • SMS
The following two tabs change content below.
  • Bio
  • Latest Posts
My Twitter profileMy Google+ profileMy LinkedIn profile

Sean Van Guilder

Director of SEO at Point It Digital Marketing
Sean Van Guilder has been helping businesses get found on the internet for over 20 years. He has a 10,000 foot view of digital marketing that helps shed light on SEO as a business driver. Sean has worn almost every digital marketing hat out there and brings strategies and tactics that have knocked the socks off of companies such as Microsoft, MSN and WONGDOODY, to name a few. Currently, Sean is leading the SEO Practice for premier digital marketing agency, Point It, in Seattle.
My Twitter profileMy Google+ profileMy LinkedIn profile

Latest posts by Sean Van Guilder (see all)

  • How User Experience & User Intent Affect Panda, Penguin & Other Google Algorithms - June 19, 2015

Filed Under: Google, SEO

Sign up for our newsletter


Trackbacks

  1. SearchCap: Google Revenge Porn Form, Bing Ads Columns & Google Cache Update says:
    June 19, 2015 at 1:01 pm

    […] User Experience & User Intent Affect Panda, Penguin & Other Google Algorithms, The SEM Post […]

Founder & Editor

Jennifer Slegg (2052)

Sign up for our daily news recap & weekly newsletter.


Follow us online

  • Facebook
  • Google+
  • Linkedin
  • Pinterest
  • Twitter

Latest News

2022 Update for Google Quality Rater Guidelines – Big YMYL Updates

We finally have the first Google Quality Rater Guidelines update of 2022, and like usual, it is … [Read More...]

Recent Posts

  • 2022 Update for Google Quality Rater Guidelines – Big YMYL Updates
  • Google Quality Rater Guidelines: The Low Quality 2021 Update
  • Rethinking Affiliate Sites With Google’s Product Review Update
  • New Google Quality Rater Guidelines, Update Adds Emphasis on Needs Met
  • Google Updates Experiment Statistics for Quality Raters
  • Analyzing “How Google Search Works” Changes from Google
  • Google Quality Rater Guidelines Update: New Introduction, Rater Bias & Political Affiliations
  • Google Updates Quality Rater Guidelines: Reputation for News Sites; Video Content Updates; Quality for Information Sites
  • Google Makes Major Changes to NoFollow, Adds Sponsored & UGC Tags
  • Google Updates Quality Rater Guidelines Targeting E-A-T, Page Quality & Interstitials

Categories

  • Affiliate Marketing
  • Amazon
  • Apple
  • Bing
  • Branding
  • Browsers
  • Chrome
  • Content Marketing
  • Design
  • Domains
  • DuckDuckGo
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Firefox
  • Foursquare
  • Google
    • Analytics
    • Google RankBrain
    • Quality Rater's Guidelines
  • History of Search
  • Industry Spotlight
  • Instagram
  • Internet Explorer
  • Links
  • Local
  • Mobile
  • Native Advertising
  • Other Search Engines
  • Pay Per Click
  • Pinterest
  • Publishers
  • Security
  • SEO
  • Snapchat
  • Social Media
  • State of the Industry
  • The SEM Post
  • Tools
  • Twitter
  • Uncategorized
  • User Experience
  • Video Marketing
  • Week in Review
  • Whitepapers
  • Wordpress
  • Yahoo
  • Yelp
  • YouTube
December 2025
MTWTFSS
« Aug  
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031 

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org

Copyright © 2025 · News Pro Theme On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in