• About Us
  • Contributors
  • Guides
  • Speaking Engagements
  • Write for The SEM Post
  • Submit a tip or contact us!
  • Newsletters

The SEM Post

Latest News About SEO, SEM, PPC & Search Engines

  • Google
  • SEO
  • Mobile
  • Local
  • Bing
  • Pay Per Click
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • State of the Industry
You are here: Home / Google / Going HTTPS: Negative Impact No Longer than 1-2 Weeks

Going HTTPS: Negative Impact No Longer than 1-2 Weeks

August 18, 2015 at 6:03 am PST By Jennifer Slegg

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
  • WhatsApp
  • Evernote
  • SMS

google negative impact httpsTwitter has been full of comments the last couple of weeks about the issue related to switching a site from HTTP to HTTPS and the resulting traffic loss from Google.  Gary Illyes from Google made a comment on Twitter today saying that SEOs who recommend against going HTTPS are wrong.

If you're an SEO and you're recommending against going HTTPS, you're wrong and you should feel bad.

— Gary Illyes (@methode) August 18, 2015

One of the biggest concerns webmasters have with switching to HTTPS – aside from ad revenue loss – is the potential to lose rankings during the migration, especially if those rankings are lasting several months like many webmasters have been reporting.

He then follows up and says that there shouldn’t be any long term negative impact for making the switch.

@DaveNaylor can you guys give me examples (sites)? There shouldn't be *any* long term negative impact when switching protocols.

— Gary Illyes (@methode) August 18, 2015

But how long should SEOs see a negative impact as a result of switching to HTTPS?  Gary Illyes is saying that “one week is understandable, two weeks, with a stretch” for things to go back to normal, and any longer than that, he would raise an eyebrow at.

@DaveNaylor one week is understandable, two weeks, with a stretch. For any longer I'd raise an eyebrow

— Gary Illyes (@methode) August 18, 2015

This is something that I have noticed more recently where SEOs are now changing their stance on whether to switch a site to HTTPS or not, due to the resulting traffic loss which does seem to take a few months to correct itself.  While there is the boost associated with HTTPS, it is pretty minor and Google has repeatedly said it acts more as a tie-breaker, at least at this time.

However, anytime someone makes changes to their URL structure, whether it is a result of a CMS change, changing URL formats or one of the many other reasons someone might choose to change URLs on a site and redirect the old ones to the new ones, there will also be a resulting traffic loss while Google sorts out the new ones. But having only a 1-2 week fluctuation period is a lot shorter than what some are reporting in practice.

Also, complexity and size of the site will also make a difference.  A three-page local business site will likely see their rankings bounce back much quicker than a site the size of Wikipedia.

Rand Fishkin recently posted on Google+ about changing Moz to HTTPS and the resulting 3 months of dropped referral traffic from Moz.


However, Moz also made changes to mobile-friendliness at the same time, and it is also harder to determine if something else is in play as well, such as an impact by an algo change unrelated to the switch to HTTPS.

He also followed up and said:

Not to say HTTPS is the wrong move; for most sites it's smart. Just know rankings & traffic may take a few weeks->few months to recover.

— Rand Fishkin (@randfish) August 18, 2015

Justin Briggs also noted a dip in the 4 clients he has migrated to HTTPS, and he saw a 5-10% dip for 2-4 weeks.  This would bring it a bit closer to the timeline Gary Illyes is saying.

@veezy 5-10% for a couple of weeks (2-4). They indexed fairly fast.

— Justin Briggs (@justinrbriggs) August 17, 2015

So in theory, if webmasters are seeing a negative impact lasting beyond the 2 weeks, then there could be an issue where something has gone awry with the HTTPS implementation and migration process.  This is something that others have seen, when there are problems related to a botched job on the redirects or other migration mistakes.

@methode I've seen several ppl botch the redirects when switching and others lose 5-10% of traffic.

— Marie Haynes (@Marie_Haynes) August 18, 2015

@Marie_Haynes I've seen some weird cases, but haven't seen a site jump due to https. I have seen the opposite, due to migration problems.

— Glenn Gabe (@glenngabe) August 18, 2015

For those making the switch, making sure you submit accurate sitemaps for both http (if you haven’t added one previously) and https with the new redirects in place should help speed up the process.

However, with the complexity of making the change for some sites, it is too bad there isn’t a related tool in Google Search Console that will help webmasters identify problems related to the migration quicker, especially for sites that may have additional signals required, such as hreflang support or complex structured data that somehow gets missed or changed during the migration process… sometimes webmasters need saving from themselves, especially for those who might be migrating a site for the first time.

So while you will likely see a dip in traffic when switching to HTTPS, since you are changing the URL structure of the site, if it lasts longer than 1-2 weeks, you should probably start looking at other migration issues that could be causing the site traffic to not bounce back to pre-HTTPS change levels.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
  • WhatsApp
  • Evernote
  • SMS
The following two tabs change content below.
  • Bio
  • Latest Posts
My Twitter profileMy Facebook profileMy Google+ profileMy LinkedIn profile

Jennifer Slegg

Founder & Editor at The SEM Post
Jennifer Slegg is a longtime speaker and expert in search engine marketing, working in the industry for almost 20 years. When she isn't sitting at her desk writing and working, she can be found grabbing a latte at her local Starbucks or planning her next trip to Disneyland. She regularly speaks at Pubcon, SMX, State of Search, Brighton SEO and more, and has been presenting at conferences for over a decade.
My Twitter profileMy Facebook profileMy Google+ profileMy LinkedIn profile

Latest posts by Jennifer Slegg (see all)

  • 2022 Update for Google Quality Rater Guidelines – Big YMYL Updates - August 1, 2022
  • Google Quality Rater Guidelines: The Low Quality 2021 Update - October 19, 2021
  • Rethinking Affiliate Sites With Google’s Product Review Update - April 23, 2021
  • New Google Quality Rater Guidelines, Update Adds Emphasis on Needs Met - October 16, 2020
  • Google Updates Experiment Statistics for Quality Raters - October 6, 2020

Filed Under: Google, SEO

Sign up for our newsletter


Founder & Editor

Jennifer Slegg (2052)

Sign up for our daily news recap & weekly newsletter.


Follow us online

  • Facebook
  • Google+
  • Linkedin
  • Pinterest
  • Twitter

Latest News

2022 Update for Google Quality Rater Guidelines – Big YMYL Updates

We finally have the first Google Quality Rater Guidelines update of 2022, and like usual, it is … [Read More...]

Recent Posts

  • 2022 Update for Google Quality Rater Guidelines – Big YMYL Updates
  • Google Quality Rater Guidelines: The Low Quality 2021 Update
  • Rethinking Affiliate Sites With Google’s Product Review Update
  • New Google Quality Rater Guidelines, Update Adds Emphasis on Needs Met
  • Google Updates Experiment Statistics for Quality Raters
  • Analyzing “How Google Search Works” Changes from Google
  • Google Quality Rater Guidelines Update: New Introduction, Rater Bias & Political Affiliations
  • Google Updates Quality Rater Guidelines: Reputation for News Sites; Video Content Updates; Quality for Information Sites
  • Google Makes Major Changes to NoFollow, Adds Sponsored & UGC Tags
  • Google Updates Quality Rater Guidelines Targeting E-A-T, Page Quality & Interstitials

Categories

  • Affiliate Marketing
  • Amazon
  • Apple
  • Bing
  • Branding
  • Browsers
  • Chrome
  • Content Marketing
  • Design
  • Domains
  • DuckDuckGo
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Firefox
  • Foursquare
  • Google
    • Analytics
    • Google RankBrain
    • Quality Rater's Guidelines
  • History of Search
  • Industry Spotlight
  • Instagram
  • Internet Explorer
  • Links
  • Local
  • Mobile
  • Native Advertising
  • Other Search Engines
  • Pay Per Click
  • Pinterest
  • Publishers
  • Security
  • SEO
  • Snapchat
  • Social Media
  • State of the Industry
  • The SEM Post
  • Tools
  • Twitter
  • Uncategorized
  • User Experience
  • Video Marketing
  • Week in Review
  • Whitepapers
  • Wordpress
  • Yahoo
  • Yelp
  • YouTube
December 2025
MTWTFSS
« Aug  
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031 

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org

Copyright © 2025 · News Pro Theme On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in