• About Us
  • Contributors
  • Guides
  • Speaking Engagements
  • Write for The SEM Post
  • Submit a tip or contact us!
  • Newsletters

The SEM Post

Latest News About SEO, SEM, PPC & Search Engines

  • Google
  • SEO
  • Mobile
  • Local
  • Bing
  • Pay Per Click
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • State of the Industry
You are here: Home / Google / Google Does Not Treat Adult Sites Differently in Search Results

Google Does Not Treat Adult Sites Differently in Search Results

March 20, 2018 at 2:28 am PST By Jennifer Slegg

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
  • WhatsApp
  • Evernote
  • SMS

Does Google treat adult sites differently in the search results when compared to non-adult sites?  The question came up last week at SMX West during the AMA with Google’s Nathan Johns, who is part of the search team at Google.

Here is the question:

How are adult sites evaluated for ranking?  Given that most of their links are poor quality or affiliate?

And Nathan Johns’ response:

Obviously, we have safe search, so we do have an algorithmic way to identify adult content.  Beyond that, there really isn’t anything else.  Each site gets treated the same.

This means, of course, that low quality links can influence how well the site does in the search results.  But if many of the site’s competitors are also in the similar situation with the quality of their links, it won’t have as much of an impact, aside from the possibility of a link-based manual action.

As for the affiliate links, Google has said previously that affiliate links won’t hurt a website, so long as they are not passing PageRank.

Johns also mentions Safe Search specifically, which will filter out adult content from the search results when it is enabled.  But whether a site is filtered in Safe Search or not would have no bearing on how it would rank for searchers who do not filter adult content via Safe Search.

This is kind of similar to the issue of affiliate sites in Google.  Google doesn’t treat affiliate sites any different from non-affiliate sites, but many affiliate sites have characteristics of low quality sites that don’t perform as well in search.  For example, many affiliate sites use product feeds which results in content that is identical to that on many other sites, or use spun content, which affects its ability to rank well in search.

Bottom line, Google doesn’t treat adult websites differently in the search results, but quality algos will still apply.  The only thing that can affect these types of sites specifically because they are adult content is for searchers with Safe Search enabled.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
  • WhatsApp
  • Evernote
  • SMS
The following two tabs change content below.
  • Bio
  • Latest Posts
My Twitter profileMy Facebook profileMy Google+ profileMy LinkedIn profile

Jennifer Slegg

Founder & Editor at The SEM Post
Jennifer Slegg is a longtime speaker and expert in search engine marketing, working in the industry for almost 20 years. When she isn't sitting at her desk writing and working, she can be found grabbing a latte at her local Starbucks or planning her next trip to Disneyland. She regularly speaks at Pubcon, SMX, State of Search, Brighton SEO and more, and has been presenting at conferences for over a decade.
My Twitter profileMy Facebook profileMy Google+ profileMy LinkedIn profile

Latest posts by Jennifer Slegg (see all)

  • Google Quality Rater Guidelines: The Low Quality 2021 Update - October 19, 2021
  • Rethinking Affiliate Sites With Google’s Product Review Update - April 23, 2021
  • New Google Quality Rater Guidelines, Update Adds Emphasis on Needs Met - October 16, 2020
  • Google Updates Experiment Statistics for Quality Raters - October 6, 2020
  • Analyzing “How Google Search Works” Changes from Google - July 8, 2020

Filed Under: Google, SEO

Sign up for our newsletter


Founder & Editor

Jennifer Slegg (2051)

Sign up for our daily news recap & weekly newsletter.


Follow us online

  • Facebook
  • Google+
  • Linkedin
  • Pinterest
  • Twitter

Latest News

Google Quality Rater Guidelines: The Low Quality 2021 Update

Google has released a new version of the Google quality rater guidelines, a year after the last … [Read More...]

Recent Posts

  • Google Quality Rater Guidelines: The Low Quality 2021 Update
  • Rethinking Affiliate Sites With Google’s Product Review Update
  • New Google Quality Rater Guidelines, Update Adds Emphasis on Needs Met
  • Google Updates Experiment Statistics for Quality Raters
  • Analyzing “How Google Search Works” Changes from Google
  • Google Quality Rater Guidelines Update: New Introduction, Rater Bias & Political Affiliations
  • Google Updates Quality Rater Guidelines: Reputation for News Sites; Video Content Updates; Quality for Information Sites
  • Google Makes Major Changes to NoFollow, Adds Sponsored & UGC Tags
  • Google Updates Quality Rater Guidelines Targeting E-A-T, Page Quality & Interstitials
  • Google Local Service Ads Display Pricing Estimates for Specific Locations

Categories

  • Affiliate Marketing
  • Amazon
  • Apple
  • Bing
  • Branding
  • Browsers
  • Chrome
  • Content Marketing
  • Design
  • Domains
  • DuckDuckGo
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Firefox
  • Foursquare
  • Google
    • Analytics
    • Google RankBrain
    • Quality Rater's Guidelines
  • History of Search
  • Industry Spotlight
  • Instagram
  • Internet Explorer
  • Links
  • Local
  • Mobile
  • Native Advertising
  • Other Search Engines
  • Pay Per Click
  • Pinterest
  • Publishers
  • Security
  • SEO
  • Snapchat
  • Social Media
  • State of the Industry
  • The SEM Post
  • Tools
  • Twitter
  • Uncategorized
  • User Experience
  • Video Marketing
  • Week in Review
  • Whitepapers
  • Wordpress
  • Yahoo
  • Yelp
  • YouTube
July 2022
MTWTFSS
« Oct  
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org

Copyright © 2022 · News Pro Theme On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in