• About Us
  • Contributors
  • Guides
  • Speaking Engagements
  • Write for The SEM Post
  • Submit a tip or contact us!
  • Newsletters

The SEM Post

Latest News About SEO, SEM, PPC & Search Engines

  • Google
  • SEO
  • Mobile
  • Local
  • Bing
  • Pay Per Click
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • State of the Industry
You are here: Home / Google / Google Rankings & Ugly or Difficult to Use Sites

Google Rankings & Ugly or Difficult to Use Sites

May 2, 2018 at 7:01 am PST By Jennifer Slegg

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
  • WhatsApp
  • Evernote
  • SMS

Does Google’s algo devalue sites that are ugly or with poor usability?  Are there any direct or indirect links between this and a site’s rankings on Google?

We do know that usability and site perception plays a large role in the Google Quality Rater Guidelines.  Raters are specifically asked to look at how easy to use and essentially how nice and trustworthy a site looks.  But these kinds of things are harder to translate into something in the algo, since while Google is rendering a site, it wouldn’t be as easy for a bot to judge usability outside of specific parameters – such as the page layout algo which demotes sites that are ad heavy at the top of the page,  or mobile friendliness.

Of course, a site has issues such as poor usability or a design that is badly done will tend to get fewer links and other recommendations, such as social media shares.  And often, these sites get fewer pages per session, especially when the site makes it difficult to get to other content on the page.

The question came up in a recent Google Webmaster Office Hours and John Mueller discussed the indirect ranking impact some of these issues have.

How likely is an ugly or difficult to use site, how likely that could cause ranking issues, so that’s an interesting question.

I think for the most part, this is something where you’re more likely to see indirect effects in the sense that when users go to your web pages and they really don’t know what they need to do there, then probably they won’t recommend your site to other people and then over time this indirect effect may grow in the sense that we don’t see a lot of signals that are like positive for this site.

In a perfect world, all sites would look professional for their market area and be easy to use, but this is often not the case.  And while Google might not devalue your site specifically for these reasons of poor usability and ugliness (although Quality Raters do rate these sites poorly), it makes a lot of sense for site owners to fix these types of reasons, not just for Google reasons, but for the site’s visitors.

If visitors don’t like your site because it is hard to use, then they will go to your competitors instead, regardless of how well Google ranks – or doesn’t rank – the site.

Here are the full comments:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
  • WhatsApp
  • Evernote
  • SMS
The following two tabs change content below.
  • Bio
  • Latest Posts
My Twitter profileMy Facebook profileMy Google+ profileMy LinkedIn profile

Jennifer Slegg

Founder & Editor at The SEM Post
Jennifer Slegg is a longtime speaker and expert in search engine marketing, working in the industry for almost 20 years. When she isn't sitting at her desk writing and working, she can be found grabbing a latte at her local Starbucks or planning her next trip to Disneyland. She regularly speaks at Pubcon, SMX, State of Search, Brighton SEO and more, and has been presenting at conferences for over a decade.
My Twitter profileMy Facebook profileMy Google+ profileMy LinkedIn profile

Latest posts by Jennifer Slegg (see all)

  • 2022 Update for Google Quality Rater Guidelines – Big YMYL Updates - August 1, 2022
  • Google Quality Rater Guidelines: The Low Quality 2021 Update - October 19, 2021
  • Rethinking Affiliate Sites With Google’s Product Review Update - April 23, 2021
  • New Google Quality Rater Guidelines, Update Adds Emphasis on Needs Met - October 16, 2020
  • Google Updates Experiment Statistics for Quality Raters - October 6, 2020

Filed Under: Google, SEO

Sign up for our newsletter


Founder & Editor

Jennifer Slegg (2052)

Sign up for our daily news recap & weekly newsletter.


Follow us online

  • Facebook
  • Google+
  • Linkedin
  • Pinterest
  • Twitter

Latest News

2022 Update for Google Quality Rater Guidelines – Big YMYL Updates

We finally have the first Google Quality Rater Guidelines update of 2022, and like usual, it is … [Read More...]

Recent Posts

  • 2022 Update for Google Quality Rater Guidelines – Big YMYL Updates
  • Google Quality Rater Guidelines: The Low Quality 2021 Update
  • Rethinking Affiliate Sites With Google’s Product Review Update
  • New Google Quality Rater Guidelines, Update Adds Emphasis on Needs Met
  • Google Updates Experiment Statistics for Quality Raters
  • Analyzing “How Google Search Works” Changes from Google
  • Google Quality Rater Guidelines Update: New Introduction, Rater Bias & Political Affiliations
  • Google Updates Quality Rater Guidelines: Reputation for News Sites; Video Content Updates; Quality for Information Sites
  • Google Makes Major Changes to NoFollow, Adds Sponsored & UGC Tags
  • Google Updates Quality Rater Guidelines Targeting E-A-T, Page Quality & Interstitials

Categories

  • Affiliate Marketing
  • Amazon
  • Apple
  • Bing
  • Branding
  • Browsers
  • Chrome
  • Content Marketing
  • Design
  • Domains
  • DuckDuckGo
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Firefox
  • Foursquare
  • Google
    • Analytics
    • Google RankBrain
    • Quality Rater's Guidelines
  • History of Search
  • Industry Spotlight
  • Instagram
  • Internet Explorer
  • Links
  • Local
  • Mobile
  • Native Advertising
  • Other Search Engines
  • Pay Per Click
  • Pinterest
  • Publishers
  • Security
  • SEO
  • Snapchat
  • Social Media
  • State of the Industry
  • The SEM Post
  • Tools
  • Twitter
  • Uncategorized
  • User Experience
  • Video Marketing
  • Week in Review
  • Whitepapers
  • Wordpress
  • Yahoo
  • Yelp
  • YouTube
November 2025
MTWTFSS
« Aug  
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org

Copyright © 2025 · News Pro Theme On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in