• About Us
  • Contributors
  • Guides
  • Speaking Engagements
  • Write for The SEM Post
  • Submit a tip or contact us!
  • Newsletters

The SEM Post

Latest News About SEO, SEM, PPC & Search Engines

  • Google
  • SEO
  • Mobile
  • Local
  • Bing
  • Pay Per Click
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • State of the Industry
You are here: Home / Google / Personalization & Universal Search Can Skew Search Analytics in Google Search Console

Personalization & Universal Search Can Skew Search Analytics in Google Search Console

February 16, 2016 at 4:10 am PST By Jennifer Slegg

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
  • WhatsApp
  • Evernote
  • SMS

search analytics personalizationIf you have looked in your Search Analytics in Google’s Search Console and see a really high position for a keyword or keyword phrase that doesn’t match up with actual traffic, there are two reasons why – either personalization or universal search results are skewing those positioning numbers.

The question was brought up in the last Google Webmaster Office Hours where someone was asking about seeing high position numbers for a search query that didn’t seem to match what they were seeing in the live search results.  John Mueller commented that it was likely personalization that is affecting the search position numbers or a case of universal search.

Universal Search is how Google will show multiple parts of a specific keyword on the initial search results page.  This could be things like image results or news results that are impacting those particular search queries.

Here is John Muller’s response about where the data for the positioning comes from.

Okay, so we don’t make it up.  It’s essentially data that we’ve seen when we show the search results to people.  So its not that this is like a theoretical ranking where your site would be ranking or the impressions it would be receiving, but rather actually what we’ve shown in search and how it was ranking at that time.

So that can include things like personalization of course, which could play a role there.  It can include things like the location of the user, the search settings that they used to search there.

One thing I use to try and figure out is is this a general ranking or is this a maybe kind of exceptional personalization type issue is to look at the number of impressions that I see there.  And if it’s a query where I think the impressions should be high but Search Console says it’s a very low number of impressions, then probably it’s something around personalization.  So if it’s like a one word query and I’d imagine the number of queries should be in the millions, and I see a couple hundred impressions, then maybe it’s just from personalization that we showed it there.

The other thing that also plays a roll there is the universal search results where we show things like the images on top, and if your site has an image that is shown in the universal search results on top, then we would count that as the web results as well.  Because it’s not just limited to looking at the rankings on the webpages themselves, but rather in this kind of not specific to images or video or whatever, your site was showing up in one of these high positions for that specific query.

As a side note, some SEO companies are known to take advantage of some client’s lack of knowledge around personalization and can get away with delivering lowered search rankings because their clients are seeing their site so high in the search results based on personalization.

This also means that because Search Analytics is showing the positioning much higher sometimes due to personalization that it could also appear that sites are ranking much higher than they really are.

But bottom line, if you are seeing high positioning for amazing keywords but can’t replicate it in the search results, check the impressions to see if universal or personalization might be playing a role.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
  • WhatsApp
  • Evernote
  • SMS
The following two tabs change content below.
  • Bio
  • Latest Posts
My Twitter profileMy Facebook profileMy Google+ profileMy LinkedIn profile

Jennifer Slegg

Founder & Editor at The SEM Post
Jennifer Slegg is a longtime speaker and expert in search engine marketing, working in the industry for almost 20 years. When she isn't sitting at her desk writing and working, she can be found grabbing a latte at her local Starbucks or planning her next trip to Disneyland. She regularly speaks at Pubcon, SMX, State of Search, Brighton SEO and more, and has been presenting at conferences for over a decade.
My Twitter profileMy Facebook profileMy Google+ profileMy LinkedIn profile

Latest posts by Jennifer Slegg (see all)

  • 2022 Update for Google Quality Rater Guidelines – Big YMYL Updates - August 1, 2022
  • Google Quality Rater Guidelines: The Low Quality 2021 Update - October 19, 2021
  • Rethinking Affiliate Sites With Google’s Product Review Update - April 23, 2021
  • New Google Quality Rater Guidelines, Update Adds Emphasis on Needs Met - October 16, 2020
  • Google Updates Experiment Statistics for Quality Raters - October 6, 2020

Filed Under: Google, SEO

Sign up for our newsletter


Comments

  1. Jonathan says

    February 16, 2016 at 11:34 pm

    Hi Jennifer,

    The location also plays a big part, so I tend to set it to UK only and this often accurately represents what I actually see myself in the serps and in other rank tracking tools.

    • Jennifer Slegg says

      February 17, 2016 at 4:41 am

      Yes, location is the common one people think of. Universal and personalization, not so much.

Founder & Editor

Jennifer Slegg (2052)

Sign up for our daily news recap & weekly newsletter.


Follow us online

  • Facebook
  • Google+
  • Linkedin
  • Pinterest
  • Twitter

Latest News

2022 Update for Google Quality Rater Guidelines – Big YMYL Updates

We finally have the first Google Quality Rater Guidelines update of 2022, and like usual, it is … [Read More...]

Recent Posts

  • 2022 Update for Google Quality Rater Guidelines – Big YMYL Updates
  • Google Quality Rater Guidelines: The Low Quality 2021 Update
  • Rethinking Affiliate Sites With Google’s Product Review Update
  • New Google Quality Rater Guidelines, Update Adds Emphasis on Needs Met
  • Google Updates Experiment Statistics for Quality Raters
  • Analyzing “How Google Search Works” Changes from Google
  • Google Quality Rater Guidelines Update: New Introduction, Rater Bias & Political Affiliations
  • Google Updates Quality Rater Guidelines: Reputation for News Sites; Video Content Updates; Quality for Information Sites
  • Google Makes Major Changes to NoFollow, Adds Sponsored & UGC Tags
  • Google Updates Quality Rater Guidelines Targeting E-A-T, Page Quality & Interstitials

Categories

  • Affiliate Marketing
  • Amazon
  • Apple
  • Bing
  • Branding
  • Browsers
  • Chrome
  • Content Marketing
  • Design
  • Domains
  • DuckDuckGo
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Firefox
  • Foursquare
  • Google
    • Analytics
    • Google RankBrain
    • Quality Rater's Guidelines
  • History of Search
  • Industry Spotlight
  • Instagram
  • Internet Explorer
  • Links
  • Local
  • Mobile
  • Native Advertising
  • Other Search Engines
  • Pay Per Click
  • Pinterest
  • Publishers
  • Security
  • SEO
  • Snapchat
  • Social Media
  • State of the Industry
  • The SEM Post
  • Tools
  • Twitter
  • Uncategorized
  • User Experience
  • Video Marketing
  • Week in Review
  • Whitepapers
  • Wordpress
  • Yahoo
  • Yelp
  • YouTube
December 2025
MTWTFSS
« Aug  
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031 

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org

Copyright © 2025 · News Pro Theme On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in