• About Us
  • Contributors
  • Guides
  • Speaking Engagements
  • Write for The SEM Post
  • Submit a tip or contact us!
  • Newsletters

The SEM Post

Latest News About SEO, SEM, PPC & Search Engines

  • Google
  • SEO
  • Mobile
  • Local
  • Bing
  • Pay Per Click
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • State of the Industry
You are here: Home / Google / No Rich Snippets? Quality of Other Sites in Same Search Results Plays Role

No Rich Snippets? Quality of Other Sites in Same Search Results Plays Role

February 17, 2016 at 4:22 am PST By Jennifer Slegg

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
  • WhatsApp
  • Evernote
  • SMS

google rich snippets other sitesZineb Ait Bahajji shared some pretty important information on Twitter this week for those who want rich snippets for their site – or who are struggling to get rich snippets to show up.

She said that Google doesn’t want to clutter up the search results too much but that another factor comes into play when it comes to which sites Google decides to show a rich snippet for (or not for).   Google will evaluate the other sites being shown in the same search query, then uses that data to decide which results have rich snippets.

She also said that length of time since the information for rich snippets was added to a page isn’t as much of a factor as quality and relevance are.

@Kevin_Monier Hello. C'est plus une question de qualités de la page et de pertinence des romich snippets que de délai

— Zineb Ait (@Missiz_Z) February 16, 2016

@Kevin_Monier enfin, nous essayons de ne pas trop "encombrer" les SERPs avec trop de sites avec RS. Du coup, vos critères sont à évaluer (1)

— Zineb Ait (@Missiz_Z) February 16, 2016

@Kevin_Monier (2) par rapport aux autres sites affichés pour la même requête.

— Zineb Ait (@Missiz_Z) February 16, 2016

[Note: The translation shown by Twitter/Bing isn’t completely accurate, for those who translated via Twitter]

I have definitely seen this in action.  Sometimes sites will see rich snippets for some search results yet not others, and others wrongly assume that just because it appears for some pages that it will appear for all.  But this seems to imply it is not only directly about how high quality the specific page is, but also about how high quality the other 9 or so sites are that also appear on that page of search results.

But this also has some vital information for SEOs – if you want rich snippets to show for a particular query, you need to ensure that Google will consider your result one of the best, if not the best, on the page for that search result.  And while everyone should always want to increase the value of the site and individual pages, this gives SEOs a bit more to work with if they know they need to make sure those individual pages are of the highest quality if they see competitors with rich snippets while they don’t.

It also leans towards the fact Google is somehow evaluating rich snippet criteria slightly differently from the regular algorithm…. perhaps with higher emphasis on one specific aspect, such as content, after all the main search algo determines the page positions in the results.  After all, we do see some sites higher in the search results without rich snippets, while some lower in the results have them.

It also reflects on the fact that we definitely see some newly marked up pages begin to display rich snippets almost immediately while some never do.

The important takeaway is that you shouldn’t just be looking at your site and see a rich snippet and think everything is good.  Instead, evaluate your more important keywords and if they aren’t showing rich snippets, instead of assuming the problem is with Google (checking that your markup validates, of course), the problem could be with your own site in relation to those other 9 sites in the search results.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
  • WhatsApp
  • Evernote
  • SMS
The following two tabs change content below.
  • Bio
  • Latest Posts
My Twitter profileMy Facebook profileMy Google+ profileMy LinkedIn profile

Jennifer Slegg

Founder & Editor at The SEM Post
Jennifer Slegg is a longtime speaker and expert in search engine marketing, working in the industry for almost 20 years. When she isn't sitting at her desk writing and working, she can be found grabbing a latte at her local Starbucks or planning her next trip to Disneyland. She regularly speaks at Pubcon, SMX, State of Search, Brighton SEO and more, and has been presenting at conferences for over a decade.
My Twitter profileMy Facebook profileMy Google+ profileMy LinkedIn profile

Latest posts by Jennifer Slegg (see all)

  • 2022 Update for Google Quality Rater Guidelines – Big YMYL Updates - August 1, 2022
  • Google Quality Rater Guidelines: The Low Quality 2021 Update - October 19, 2021
  • Rethinking Affiliate Sites With Google’s Product Review Update - April 23, 2021
  • New Google Quality Rater Guidelines, Update Adds Emphasis on Needs Met - October 16, 2020
  • Google Updates Experiment Statistics for Quality Raters - October 6, 2020

Filed Under: Google, SEO

Sign up for our newsletter


Comments

  1. Paul says

    February 17, 2016 at 9:21 pm

    Thanks for great insight…from someone wanting their rich snippets displayed in Google.

Founder & Editor

Jennifer Slegg (2052)

Sign up for our daily news recap & weekly newsletter.


Follow us online

  • Facebook
  • Google+
  • Linkedin
  • Pinterest
  • Twitter

Latest News

2022 Update for Google Quality Rater Guidelines – Big YMYL Updates

We finally have the first Google Quality Rater Guidelines update of 2022, and like usual, it is … [Read More...]

Recent Posts

  • 2022 Update for Google Quality Rater Guidelines – Big YMYL Updates
  • Google Quality Rater Guidelines: The Low Quality 2021 Update
  • Rethinking Affiliate Sites With Google’s Product Review Update
  • New Google Quality Rater Guidelines, Update Adds Emphasis on Needs Met
  • Google Updates Experiment Statistics for Quality Raters
  • Analyzing “How Google Search Works” Changes from Google
  • Google Quality Rater Guidelines Update: New Introduction, Rater Bias & Political Affiliations
  • Google Updates Quality Rater Guidelines: Reputation for News Sites; Video Content Updates; Quality for Information Sites
  • Google Makes Major Changes to NoFollow, Adds Sponsored & UGC Tags
  • Google Updates Quality Rater Guidelines Targeting E-A-T, Page Quality & Interstitials

Categories

  • Affiliate Marketing
  • Amazon
  • Apple
  • Bing
  • Branding
  • Browsers
  • Chrome
  • Content Marketing
  • Design
  • Domains
  • DuckDuckGo
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Firefox
  • Foursquare
  • Google
    • Analytics
    • Google RankBrain
    • Quality Rater's Guidelines
  • History of Search
  • Industry Spotlight
  • Instagram
  • Internet Explorer
  • Links
  • Local
  • Mobile
  • Native Advertising
  • Other Search Engines
  • Pay Per Click
  • Pinterest
  • Publishers
  • Security
  • SEO
  • Snapchat
  • Social Media
  • State of the Industry
  • The SEM Post
  • Tools
  • Twitter
  • Uncategorized
  • User Experience
  • Video Marketing
  • Week in Review
  • Whitepapers
  • Wordpress
  • Yahoo
  • Yelp
  • YouTube
December 2025
MTWTFSS
« Aug  
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031 

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org

Copyright © 2025 · News Pro Theme On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in