• About Us
  • Contributors
  • Guides
  • Speaking Engagements
  • Write for The SEM Post
  • Submit a tip or contact us!
  • Newsletters

The SEM Post

Latest News About SEO, SEM, PPC & Search Engines

  • Google
  • SEO
  • Mobile
  • Local
  • Bing
  • Pay Per Click
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • State of the Industry
You are here: Home / Google / There is No Duplicate Content Penalty in Google

There is No Duplicate Content Penalty in Google

March 6, 2015 at 4:08 am PST By Jennifer Slegg

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
  • WhatsApp
  • Evernote
  • SMS

google webmaster tools headerThere is no duplicate content penalty.  Yes, really.

The issue of duplicate content is a real one for webmasters.  But Gary Illyes at SMX this week stressed that duplicate content is not a penalty and that it is just a myth – it is actually a filter.

Even though duplicate content is not technically a penalty, it is referred to as such because it does act similarly to a penalty because it will not rank duplicate search results unless a searcher clicks on the link at the bottom showing “display search results similar to the pages shown above”.

But having duplicate content will not penalize a site in any way, and it doesn’t affect pages on the site that aren’t duplicated.  So just because you have duplicate content doesn’t mean your site will never see the light of day in Google, just those duplicate pages could be hidden away.

That said, many SEOs will continue calling it a “duplicate content penalty”, but just be aware that the idea of duplicate content being a penalty is a myth.

Added: Don’t forget that duplicate content on a large scale does play a role into the Panda algo, however this tends to be for sites who steal their content from others, not those who originate the content in most cases.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
  • WhatsApp
  • Evernote
  • SMS
The following two tabs change content below.
  • Bio
  • Latest Posts
My Twitter profileMy Facebook profileMy Google+ profileMy LinkedIn profile

Jennifer Slegg

Founder & Editor at The SEM Post
Jennifer Slegg is a longtime speaker and expert in search engine marketing, working in the industry for almost 20 years. When she isn't sitting at her desk writing and working, she can be found grabbing a latte at her local Starbucks or planning her next trip to Disneyland. She regularly speaks at Pubcon, SMX, State of Search, Brighton SEO and more, and has been presenting at conferences for over a decade.
My Twitter profileMy Facebook profileMy Google+ profileMy LinkedIn profile

Latest posts by Jennifer Slegg (see all)

  • 2022 Update for Google Quality Rater Guidelines – Big YMYL Updates - August 1, 2022
  • Google Quality Rater Guidelines: The Low Quality 2021 Update - October 19, 2021
  • Rethinking Affiliate Sites With Google’s Product Review Update - April 23, 2021
  • New Google Quality Rater Guidelines, Update Adds Emphasis on Needs Met - October 16, 2020
  • Google Updates Experiment Statistics for Quality Raters - October 6, 2020

Filed Under: Google, SEO Tagged With: duplicate content

Sign up for our newsletter


Comments

  1. Alan Bleiweiss says

    March 6, 2015 at 11:05 am

    Right. It’s not a penalty. Except if two pages are duplicate of each other, Google has to “figure it all out” regarding which of those pages should show up and which should be “buried”.

    If enough content on a site exists that’s duplicate across enough pages, the site will most definitely suffer in many different ways.

    So even though it’s not a “penalty”, and because it IS a “filter”, it’s NOT good to have duplicate content. You NEVER want to leave it to Google to “figure it all out”.

    I can’t tell you how many times I’ve audited sites where duplicate content issues seriously harmed important pages.

    • Roxann Souci says

      March 23, 2015 at 8:59 pm

      Neil Patel write a blog saying that he used to freely allow the posting of his articles on others sites. Then one for posted to a site with more “juice.” Google went with the other site as the original authors and shut down Neil’s site.

      I wouldn’t rely on any info regarding Google that isn’t current. There have been too many changes. I’ll

      • Roxann Souci says

        March 23, 2015 at 9:00 pm

        Please excuse any typos. I’m writing this on my phone.

      • Jennifer Slegg says

        March 23, 2015 at 9:47 pm

        Yes, Google will usually only post the one that it deems the “original”. However, it isn’t a true penalty, as it doesn’t downrank the rest of a site. It just essentially demotes the one it determines is a duplicate, unless someone clicks the “similar results” link at the bottom of the search results.

        • Roxann Souci says

          March 23, 2015 at 10:49 pm

          I stand corrected. I was under a total misunderstanding. I am very grateful for the correct info. Of course, I always write original content, but I feel badly about telling a client incorrect info. What a great place to get accurate info. Thanks!

  2. Bruce says

    March 9, 2015 at 3:04 am

    Is there an official comment from Mr Google on this assertion?

    • Jennifer Slegg says

      March 9, 2015 at 3:21 am

      It was said at SMX and numerous people tweeted it at the time. There is also a webmaster central blog post from Google a few years back which stated the same.

  3. Dan Petrovic says

    March 9, 2015 at 6:38 am

    Semantics.

  4. Xavier Deloffre says

    March 9, 2015 at 6:54 am

    A remark that left doubtful ,)

  5. Sinisa Gavrilovic says

    May 26, 2015 at 2:25 am

    Not true.

    This is how Google manual action/penalty looks like:

    Thin content with little or no added value
    This site appears to contain a significant percentage of low-quality or shallow pages which do not provide users with much added value (such as thin affiliate pages, cookie-cutter sites, doorway pages, automatically generated content, or copied content).

    Of course you will not get your self penalized if you copy paste several articles or just peaces of content, but if you copy-paste entire website, and clone it on different domain, linkbuild it for same keywords, you’re on the way to get penalized….

    • Jennifer Slegg says

      May 26, 2015 at 5:30 pm

      We are talking too different things. You are referring to a site that wholesale copies entire other sites that offers little value, which does get penalized by Panda. However, what they are talking about specifically here is more from the point of view of the site whose content is being stolen, and whether they need to worry about being penalized because someone else has stolen their content.

      • Sinisa Gavrilovic says

        May 27, 2015 at 4:12 am

        I’m commenting your article, not the comments.

        Title says:
        There is No Duplicate Content Penalty in Google.

        NOT true.

        Than you state:
        Be aware that the idea of duplicate content being a penalty is a myth.

        NOT true.

        I’m referring to your article punchline statements, not to some specific case, because you did not mention specific case in article (eg. partially stolen content).

        Reality is: if you duplicate your content it might lead to direct penalty. If you clone entire website it may lead to penalty.
        That penalty exists, has name, and it’s used by google.

        I’d rewrite this article, because you’re misleading readers. You’re article refers to specific case of duplicated content, not all.cases.

        In Case only parts of the content are stolen, duplicated or cloned, you will not get penalized, it can “only” affect your website rank or innerpage rank. Nothing more. Large scale duplications lead to penalty…

        Sinisa Gavrilovic
        SEO Analyst

        • Jennifer Slegg says

          May 27, 2015 at 6:41 am

          If you read the article however, it is directly quoting what was said at Google specifically about duplicate content, where it was said the duplicate content penalty is a myth. This is as a standalone penalty. The factor duplicate content plays in the Panda algo is separate from what Google is referring to. I did add a reference to Panda to the original article to clarify.

Trackbacks

  1. SearchCap: Google Drops Links, AdWords Structed Snippets & Mobile-Friendly Algorithm says:
    March 6, 2015 at 1:00 pm

    […] There is no duplicate content penalty, The SEM Post […]

  2. Duplicate Content Will Not Trigger a Penalty... With One Exception - The SEM Post says:
    April 10, 2015 at 7:02 am

    […] SMX West, Gary Illyes talked about how duplicate content is not a penalty, it is merely a filter.  In today’s Google Webmaster Office Hours Hangout, John was asked a […]

Founder & Editor

Jennifer Slegg (2052)

Sign up for our daily news recap & weekly newsletter.


Follow us online

  • Facebook
  • Google+
  • Linkedin
  • Pinterest
  • Twitter

Latest News

2022 Update for Google Quality Rater Guidelines – Big YMYL Updates

We finally have the first Google Quality Rater Guidelines update of 2022, and like usual, it is … [Read More...]

Recent Posts

  • 2022 Update for Google Quality Rater Guidelines – Big YMYL Updates
  • Google Quality Rater Guidelines: The Low Quality 2021 Update
  • Rethinking Affiliate Sites With Google’s Product Review Update
  • New Google Quality Rater Guidelines, Update Adds Emphasis on Needs Met
  • Google Updates Experiment Statistics for Quality Raters
  • Analyzing “How Google Search Works” Changes from Google
  • Google Quality Rater Guidelines Update: New Introduction, Rater Bias & Political Affiliations
  • Google Updates Quality Rater Guidelines: Reputation for News Sites; Video Content Updates; Quality for Information Sites
  • Google Makes Major Changes to NoFollow, Adds Sponsored & UGC Tags
  • Google Updates Quality Rater Guidelines Targeting E-A-T, Page Quality & Interstitials

Categories

  • Affiliate Marketing
  • Amazon
  • Apple
  • Bing
  • Branding
  • Browsers
  • Chrome
  • Content Marketing
  • Design
  • Domains
  • DuckDuckGo
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Firefox
  • Foursquare
  • Google
    • Analytics
    • Google RankBrain
    • Quality Rater's Guidelines
  • History of Search
  • Industry Spotlight
  • Instagram
  • Internet Explorer
  • Links
  • Local
  • Mobile
  • Native Advertising
  • Other Search Engines
  • Pay Per Click
  • Pinterest
  • Publishers
  • Security
  • SEO
  • Snapchat
  • Social Media
  • State of the Industry
  • The SEM Post
  • Tools
  • Twitter
  • Uncategorized
  • User Experience
  • Video Marketing
  • Week in Review
  • Whitepapers
  • Wordpress
  • Yahoo
  • Yelp
  • YouTube
March 2023
MTWTFSS
« Aug  
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031 

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org

Copyright © 2023 · News Pro Theme On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in