• About Us
  • Contributors
  • Guides
  • Speaking Engagements
  • Write for The SEM Post
  • Submit a tip or contact us!
  • Newsletters

The SEM Post

Latest News About SEO, SEM, PPC & Search Engines

  • Google
  • SEO
  • Mobile
  • Local
  • Bing
  • Pay Per Click
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • State of the Industry
You are here: Home / Google / Google: Don’t Nofollow Your Own Internal Links

Google: Don’t Nofollow Your Own Internal Links

May 6, 2016 at 4:00 am PST By Jennifer Slegg

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
  • WhatsApp
  • Evernote
  • SMS

google nofollow internalAre you nofollowing internal links on your site?  If so, you might want to remove them unless you have a pretty good reason to be using it.

Recently, nofollowing internal links gained traction as many webmasters who received a recent outbound link manual action decided to nofollow every link on their sites, including internal links as well.

Gary Illyes, in yesterday’s keynote with Stone Temple said that sites shouldn’t nofollow their own internal links.

Nofollow is probably never the answer, especially on your own site. I can think of corner case scenarios where the target page would be robotted for whatever reason, and then if it is robotted and not indexed yet, if you don’t want to get that page indexed, then you probably don’t want to point to it with anchors.

John Mueller did say this previously, but in respect to the outbound link manual actions.  Last month, when Google sent out a mass number of outbound link manual actions targeting bloggers who did paid reviews without disclosing or nofollowing the links, many bloggers simply nofollowed every link on their site… some who nofollowed their internal links too.

And some people attempt to use nofollow either to prevent a page from being indexed (you are best to block the from robots.txt prior to publishing or place a noindex on it if Google has indexed it first).

And lastly, some use in in an attempt to influence crawl budget or for PageRank sculpting.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
  • WhatsApp
  • Evernote
  • SMS
The following two tabs change content below.
  • Bio
  • Latest Posts
My Twitter profileMy Facebook profileMy Google+ profileMy LinkedIn profile

Jennifer Slegg

Founder & Editor at The SEM Post
Jennifer Slegg is a longtime speaker and expert in search engine marketing, working in the industry for almost 20 years. When she isn't sitting at her desk writing and working, she can be found grabbing a latte at her local Starbucks or planning her next trip to Disneyland. She regularly speaks at Pubcon, SMX, State of Search, Brighton SEO and more, and has been presenting at conferences for over a decade.
My Twitter profileMy Facebook profileMy Google+ profileMy LinkedIn profile

Latest posts by Jennifer Slegg (see all)

  • 2022 Update for Google Quality Rater Guidelines – Big YMYL Updates - August 1, 2022
  • Google Quality Rater Guidelines: The Low Quality 2021 Update - October 19, 2021
  • Rethinking Affiliate Sites With Google’s Product Review Update - April 23, 2021
  • New Google Quality Rater Guidelines, Update Adds Emphasis on Needs Met - October 16, 2020
  • Google Updates Experiment Statistics for Quality Raters - October 6, 2020

Filed Under: Google, Links, SEO

Sign up for our newsletter


Comments

  1. Mark Traphagen says

    May 6, 2016 at 6:17 am

    Thanks for highlighting this important tip from our Virtual Keynote with Gary, Jennifer. Just to add one thing to the final remark, about trying to use nofollow for PageRank sculpting, Eric Enge clarified with Gary that the PageRank (and any other authority signal not passed by the no-followed link is NOT redistributed to the other links on the page.

  2. David says

    May 6, 2016 at 10:24 am

    Hey Jennifer,

    This is very timely for me – I’ve been trying to get John Mueller to reply re: this topic via Twitter for the last couple weeks without success – my focus is about controlling crawl using nofollow attribute on links.

    Example: Imagine a situation where an ecomm site creates duplicate pages due to faceted nav, and we don’t want those dupe pages wasting crawl budget… so imagine there’s a huge number of dupes and for sake or argument, can’t be fixed at the root cause so we’re left working with rel canonical etc., robots.txt file, robots meta tags and nofollow attribute on links – so if we don’t want Googlebot to even bother crawling those dupe URLs in the first place (improve crawl budget) then what I want to know is, is using the nofollow attribute on links to those dupe pages going to successfully improve the crawl budget?-i.e., will Googlebot literally not follow those links therefore improving crawl budget? Note that I’m not interested here in page rank sculpting, just controlling crawl.

    Google’s own doc here https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/96569?hl=en seems to indicate that you can indeed control crawl budget using nofollow attribute on links.

    Can you help clarify this question?

    Thanks!
    David

    • Jennifer Slegg says

      May 6, 2016 at 1:49 pm

      I’ll have a look at that. Also re crawl budget: http://www.thesempost.com/google-links-partial-sitemaps-crawling/

      • David says

        May 6, 2016 at 5:01 pm

        Much thanks, Jennifer – and to repeat for clarity’s sake, I’m 100% clear about the PageRank aspect (as Mark Traphagen noted here) – I’m only interested in if I can control crawl / preserve crawl budget using the nofollow attribute on internal links to dupe pages. Thanks again! -David

        • Jennifer Slegg says

          May 7, 2016 at 5:19 am

          Yes you can, but don’t forget Google doesn’t follow a path as it crawls your site, as Gary said in the video, so it isn’t a “sure thing” solution. Any reason to not canonicalize dupes?

        • Osanda Cooray says

          May 26, 2016 at 9:57 am

          Hi David,

          My understanding is applying “no-follow” doesn’t mean Google won’t crawl those URLs. Can someone please confirm this ?

          Also I wonder would not robots.txt be an ideal solution to control this ?

          Cheers,
          Osanda

Founder & Editor

Jennifer Slegg (2052)

Sign up for our daily news recap & weekly newsletter.


Follow us online

  • Facebook
  • Google+
  • Linkedin
  • Pinterest
  • Twitter

Latest News

2022 Update for Google Quality Rater Guidelines – Big YMYL Updates

We finally have the first Google Quality Rater Guidelines update of 2022, and like usual, it is … [Read More...]

Recent Posts

  • 2022 Update for Google Quality Rater Guidelines – Big YMYL Updates
  • Google Quality Rater Guidelines: The Low Quality 2021 Update
  • Rethinking Affiliate Sites With Google’s Product Review Update
  • New Google Quality Rater Guidelines, Update Adds Emphasis on Needs Met
  • Google Updates Experiment Statistics for Quality Raters
  • Analyzing “How Google Search Works” Changes from Google
  • Google Quality Rater Guidelines Update: New Introduction, Rater Bias & Political Affiliations
  • Google Updates Quality Rater Guidelines: Reputation for News Sites; Video Content Updates; Quality for Information Sites
  • Google Makes Major Changes to NoFollow, Adds Sponsored & UGC Tags
  • Google Updates Quality Rater Guidelines Targeting E-A-T, Page Quality & Interstitials

Categories

  • Affiliate Marketing
  • Amazon
  • Apple
  • Bing
  • Branding
  • Browsers
  • Chrome
  • Content Marketing
  • Design
  • Domains
  • DuckDuckGo
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Firefox
  • Foursquare
  • Google
    • Analytics
    • Google RankBrain
    • Quality Rater's Guidelines
  • History of Search
  • Industry Spotlight
  • Instagram
  • Internet Explorer
  • Links
  • Local
  • Mobile
  • Native Advertising
  • Other Search Engines
  • Pay Per Click
  • Pinterest
  • Publishers
  • Security
  • SEO
  • Snapchat
  • Social Media
  • State of the Industry
  • The SEM Post
  • Tools
  • Twitter
  • Uncategorized
  • User Experience
  • Video Marketing
  • Week in Review
  • Whitepapers
  • Wordpress
  • Yahoo
  • Yelp
  • YouTube
May 2025
MTWTFSS
« Aug  
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org

Copyright © 2025 · News Pro Theme On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in