• About Us
  • Contributors
  • Guides
  • Speaking Engagements
  • Write for The SEM Post
  • Submit a tip or contact us!
  • Newsletters

The SEM Post

Latest News About SEO, SEM, PPC & Search Engines

  • Google
  • SEO
  • Mobile
  • Local
  • Bing
  • Pay Per Click
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • State of the Industry
You are here: Home / Google / Google Planning to Devalue Content Behind Interstitials

Google Planning to Devalue Content Behind Interstitials

June 4, 2015 at 5:11 am PST By Jennifer Slegg

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
  • WhatsApp
  • Evernote
  • SMS

google devalue interstitialsWe have known for a couple of months that Google was planning to add interstitials as a negative ranking factor in an upcoming mobile friendly algo, but it appears that the same will be coming to the regular search results too.

Maile Ohye from Google warned webmasters at SMX Advanced that they will also be bringing up the issue of interstitials and how pages that use them will be affected.  “Interstitials are bad for users, so be aware this is something we are thinking about,” she said.

She then continued on to say that content hidden behind interstitials would be devalued.

While many mobile websites use interstitials specifically to redirect users to download an app instead of just visit the site, the vast majority of desktop served interstitials are monetization efforts, displaying ads or even a video ad that must be viewed before the user can read the article.

Many are in the form of “View this image ad for 10 seconds before you can visit the site,” a format that nearly everyone has run into while trying to read an article on sites like Forbes.  And they then require an additional click to then read the article, it does not automatically redirect the user (although some do).    Here is the example of Forbes.com’s interstitial.

 

It will also be interesting to see if Google also considers content hidden behind a “answer these survey questions to read the content”, as those sites are also effectively blocking the content from being read until an action is performed.  These particular ones are a pet peeve of mine, and I always click back rather than answer.

This, of course, leads to the question of whether they will devalue content with a pop-over or overlay, something that some people suspect has been a negative ranking signal, so many sites code it to only show up on a second page view and not the first, so Googlebot doesn’t see it.

From a user perspective, this is great news.  And since we all know Google does put searchers first, it is not surprising that interstitials are on a hit list by Google.

So if you are using interstitials, you will definitely want to consider whether the financial payoff from the interstitial is worth the potential loss in Google search rankings…. I am going to guess that interstitials will be on the losing side of that argument for many companies that become aware of this.

This is also something that could be included in Google Search Console, to alert site owners that Google has detected an interstitial and why they should consider removing it.

 

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
  • WhatsApp
  • Evernote
  • SMS
The following two tabs change content below.
  • Bio
  • Latest Posts
My Twitter profileMy Facebook profileMy Google+ profileMy LinkedIn profile

Jennifer Slegg

Founder & Editor at The SEM Post
Jennifer Slegg is a longtime speaker and expert in search engine marketing, working in the industry for almost 20 years. When she isn't sitting at her desk writing and working, she can be found grabbing a latte at her local Starbucks or planning her next trip to Disneyland. She regularly speaks at Pubcon, SMX, State of Search, Brighton SEO and more, and has been presenting at conferences for over a decade.
My Twitter profileMy Facebook profileMy Google+ profileMy LinkedIn profile

Latest posts by Jennifer Slegg (see all)

  • 2022 Update for Google Quality Rater Guidelines – Big YMYL Updates - August 1, 2022
  • Google Quality Rater Guidelines: The Low Quality 2021 Update - October 19, 2021
  • Rethinking Affiliate Sites With Google’s Product Review Update - April 23, 2021
  • New Google Quality Rater Guidelines, Update Adds Emphasis on Needs Met - October 16, 2020
  • Google Updates Experiment Statistics for Quality Raters - October 6, 2020

Filed Under: Google, SEO

Sign up for our newsletter


Comments

  1. Elena Remus says

    June 4, 2015 at 3:17 pm

    I’m curious as to what Google will do about geo redirection interstitials . . .

    • Ralph du Plessis says

      June 5, 2015 at 2:20 am

      That’s a good point Elena. It might be a case of introducing a new tag like rel canonical serves a purposed for duplicate content e.g. rel=georedirect

      • Elena Remus says

        June 5, 2015 at 2:16 pm

        Are you referring to rel=”alternate” hreflang=”x”?

  2. Ralph du Plessis says

    June 5, 2015 at 2:19 am

    “From a user perspective, this is great news” – totally agree. This is good news as I hate them as much as I hate click bait headlines. And there is no “first click free” solution for this one. I guess this is Google imposing it straight off the bat, so the same thing really.
    Now… what if you put Adsense on the interstitials??? 🙂

    • Jennifer Slegg says

      June 5, 2015 at 3:26 am

      Pretty sure it is still against the AdSense rules to do that 🙂 If it wasn’t, the web would be littered with a lot more interstitials!

  3. MamboMan says

    June 5, 2015 at 4:26 am

    Good news. But just because they say they’re going to “devaulue” this content, doesn’t mean it’s going away.

Trackbacks

  1. Your Mobile App Questions Answered With Google’s Mariya Moeva says:
    June 30, 2015 at 8:03 am

    […] We see app install interstitials bother users, so we’re looking into ways of addressing that; stay tuned for more news (Editor’s note: Google’s Maile Ohye also commented on this at the most recent SMX Advanced). […]

Founder & Editor

Jennifer Slegg (2052)

Sign up for our daily news recap & weekly newsletter.


Follow us online

  • Facebook
  • Google+
  • Linkedin
  • Pinterest
  • Twitter

Latest News

2022 Update for Google Quality Rater Guidelines – Big YMYL Updates

We finally have the first Google Quality Rater Guidelines update of 2022, and like usual, it is … [Read More...]

Recent Posts

  • 2022 Update for Google Quality Rater Guidelines – Big YMYL Updates
  • Google Quality Rater Guidelines: The Low Quality 2021 Update
  • Rethinking Affiliate Sites With Google’s Product Review Update
  • New Google Quality Rater Guidelines, Update Adds Emphasis on Needs Met
  • Google Updates Experiment Statistics for Quality Raters
  • Analyzing “How Google Search Works” Changes from Google
  • Google Quality Rater Guidelines Update: New Introduction, Rater Bias & Political Affiliations
  • Google Updates Quality Rater Guidelines: Reputation for News Sites; Video Content Updates; Quality for Information Sites
  • Google Makes Major Changes to NoFollow, Adds Sponsored & UGC Tags
  • Google Updates Quality Rater Guidelines Targeting E-A-T, Page Quality & Interstitials

Categories

  • Affiliate Marketing
  • Amazon
  • Apple
  • Bing
  • Branding
  • Browsers
  • Chrome
  • Content Marketing
  • Design
  • Domains
  • DuckDuckGo
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Firefox
  • Foursquare
  • Google
    • Analytics
    • Google RankBrain
    • Quality Rater's Guidelines
  • History of Search
  • Industry Spotlight
  • Instagram
  • Internet Explorer
  • Links
  • Local
  • Mobile
  • Native Advertising
  • Other Search Engines
  • Pay Per Click
  • Pinterest
  • Publishers
  • Security
  • SEO
  • Snapchat
  • Social Media
  • State of the Industry
  • The SEM Post
  • Tools
  • Twitter
  • Uncategorized
  • User Experience
  • Video Marketing
  • Week in Review
  • Whitepapers
  • Wordpress
  • Yahoo
  • Yelp
  • YouTube
June 2025
MTWTFSS
« Aug  
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30 

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org

Copyright © 2025 · News Pro Theme On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in