• About Us
  • Contributors
  • Guides
  • Speaking Engagements
  • Write for The SEM Post
  • Submit a tip or contact us!
  • Newsletters

The SEM Post

Latest News About SEO, SEM, PPC & Search Engines

  • Google
  • SEO
  • Mobile
  • Local
  • Bing
  • Pay Per Click
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • State of the Industry
You are here: Home / Google / Removing Low Quality Pages Won’t Result in Sitewide Google Rankings Boost

Removing Low Quality Pages Won’t Result in Sitewide Google Rankings Boost

October 13, 2017 at 6:03 am PST By Jennifer Slegg

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
  • WhatsApp
  • Evernote
  • SMS

At State of Search this week, I asked Gary Illyes from Google about the issue surrounding removing or noindexing low quality content versus leaving it or improving it.  It has been a long debated topic from SEOs, especially for those sites suffering from Panda issues.

I specifically asked about whether or not noindexing low quality content would improve the rankings on the remaining higher quality pages on the site, and it seems as though simply removing low quality content isn’t necessarily the “quick rankings fix” many assumed it was.

Its not guaranteed that you will see any positive effect from that.  Basically if you have lots of crappy content pages and hopefully you are not going to rank for those pages, but if you do and you noindex those pages, then you are lowering your own traffic by noindexing those pages.

I don’t like the idea of noindexing pages, I would much rather see site owners improve the pages that show up in the search results.  For those that don’t show up in the search results, those are not indexed, and if they are not indexed then typically they are not affecting your site.

This is something I also recommend – before removing content, check to see if there are any visitors to those pages and if there are Google search referrals to them.  If there are, Google considers them high enough quality to at least include in the search results.

He does state that there are exceptions, such as if a site has been hacked and injected with a bunch of spam.

There are corner cases – for example of there are hacked pages, those will absolutely affect your search presence. Otherwise I would clearly work to improve those pages.

So removing low quality content won’t result in the fast fix with increased rankings across the rest of the site.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
  • WhatsApp
  • Evernote
  • SMS
The following two tabs change content below.
  • Bio
  • Latest Posts
My Twitter profileMy Facebook profileMy Google+ profileMy LinkedIn profile

Jennifer Slegg

Founder & Editor at The SEM Post
Jennifer Slegg is a longtime speaker and expert in search engine marketing, working in the industry for almost 20 years. When she isn't sitting at her desk writing and working, she can be found grabbing a latte at her local Starbucks or planning her next trip to Disneyland. She regularly speaks at Pubcon, SMX, State of Search, Brighton SEO and more, and has been presenting at conferences for over a decade.
My Twitter profileMy Facebook profileMy Google+ profileMy LinkedIn profile

Latest posts by Jennifer Slegg (see all)

  • 2022 Update for Google Quality Rater Guidelines – Big YMYL Updates - August 1, 2022
  • Google Quality Rater Guidelines: The Low Quality 2021 Update - October 19, 2021
  • Rethinking Affiliate Sites With Google’s Product Review Update - April 23, 2021
  • New Google Quality Rater Guidelines, Update Adds Emphasis on Needs Met - October 16, 2020
  • Google Updates Experiment Statistics for Quality Raters - October 6, 2020

Filed Under: Google, SEO

Sign up for our newsletter


Comments

  1. Marie Haynes says

    October 13, 2017 at 6:40 am

    This is such a controversial subject. We’ve discussed this before and I do really feel that some sites can improve by removing content from the web.

    I think that the problem is in knowing what content to remove. I see people going crazy removing thousands of old articles that once were valuable. That’s not likely going to help.

    But, to me, in some cases it really does make sense to remove content that is not helpful to anyone. For example, some CMS’s will produce tens of thousands of pages with a single image, or review pages (where the review also exists on the main page) or dynamically generated pages that try to rank for every keyword under the sun.

    Noindexing content like that just makes sense to me. These are pages that can’t be improved upon.

    To me it doesn’t sound like Gary is saying that you’ll never get a ranking boost by removing thin content. He did say that it’s not a quick fix and that’s true. If you have tens of thousands or even hundreds of thousands of crappy pages and you remove those it’s likely going to take months for the algorithms to recognize that the overall quality of indexed content on your site will improve.

    With that said, Jen was there with Gary and I was not. 🙂

    I do agree with Jen’s comment that we should not be removing pages that are getting visitors from search.

    I felt compelled to leave a comment on this article though as I feel that the title should perhaps say, “Removing Low Quality Pages Won’t ***necessarily*** Result in Sitewide Google Rankings Boost”. Again, I still think it is important to remove thin pages, especially those that appear in large quantities. But it is important to know what should be removed and what should stay.

Founder & Editor

Jennifer Slegg (2052)

Sign up for our daily news recap & weekly newsletter.


Follow us online

  • Facebook
  • Google+
  • Linkedin
  • Pinterest
  • Twitter

Latest News

2022 Update for Google Quality Rater Guidelines – Big YMYL Updates

We finally have the first Google Quality Rater Guidelines update of 2022, and like usual, it is … [Read More...]

Recent Posts

  • 2022 Update for Google Quality Rater Guidelines – Big YMYL Updates
  • Google Quality Rater Guidelines: The Low Quality 2021 Update
  • Rethinking Affiliate Sites With Google’s Product Review Update
  • New Google Quality Rater Guidelines, Update Adds Emphasis on Needs Met
  • Google Updates Experiment Statistics for Quality Raters
  • Analyzing “How Google Search Works” Changes from Google
  • Google Quality Rater Guidelines Update: New Introduction, Rater Bias & Political Affiliations
  • Google Updates Quality Rater Guidelines: Reputation for News Sites; Video Content Updates; Quality for Information Sites
  • Google Makes Major Changes to NoFollow, Adds Sponsored & UGC Tags
  • Google Updates Quality Rater Guidelines Targeting E-A-T, Page Quality & Interstitials

Categories

  • Affiliate Marketing
  • Amazon
  • Apple
  • Bing
  • Branding
  • Browsers
  • Chrome
  • Content Marketing
  • Design
  • Domains
  • DuckDuckGo
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Firefox
  • Foursquare
  • Google
    • Analytics
    • Google RankBrain
    • Quality Rater's Guidelines
  • History of Search
  • Industry Spotlight
  • Instagram
  • Internet Explorer
  • Links
  • Local
  • Mobile
  • Native Advertising
  • Other Search Engines
  • Pay Per Click
  • Pinterest
  • Publishers
  • Security
  • SEO
  • Snapchat
  • Social Media
  • State of the Industry
  • The SEM Post
  • Tools
  • Twitter
  • Uncategorized
  • User Experience
  • Video Marketing
  • Week in Review
  • Whitepapers
  • Wordpress
  • Yahoo
  • Yelp
  • YouTube
May 2025
MTWTFSS
« Aug  
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org

Copyright © 2025 · News Pro Theme On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in