• About Us
  • Contributors
  • Guides
  • Speaking Engagements
  • Write for The SEM Post
  • Submit a tip or contact us!
  • Newsletters

The SEM Post

Latest News About SEO, SEM, PPC & Search Engines

  • Google
  • SEO
  • Mobile
  • Local
  • Bing
  • Pay Per Click
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • State of the Industry
You are here: Home / Google / Should You Change Dates on Evergreen Content for SEO?

Should You Change Dates on Evergreen Content for SEO?

January 21, 2016 at 4:55 am PST By Jennifer Slegg

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
  • WhatsApp
  • Evernote
  • SMS

dates evergreen content seoIn today’s Google Webmaster Hangout, the question came up regarding evergreen content and the dates used on them.  This has been a hot topic recently, especially since Google sometimes displays the date in the search results.  But does this affect rankings specifically?

Does the date of publish on the page affect google rankings? What is the ideal practice to be followed in case of old posts with evergreen posts should the dates be removed or updated to a more recent one

The response by Aaseesh Marina from Google, one of the hosts of the English/Hindi office hours:

It can be affected if it’s relevant to the query.  If someone is searching, and using the search tools and searching for  a certain article on mobile phones between April 2005 and March 2007 or something, then we’ll probably take into consideration the date of publish on the page or the date that you’ve provided because it’s relevant to the query.

But otherwise I don’t see any other ranking issue.

But usually, content that is evergreen isn’t necessarily one of the topics that the date is much of a concern.  And if it is a concern, you might be better with writing a fresh new article entirely, focusing on what is new or changed.  For example, a page on treatment for a specific type of cancer wouldn’t be considered evergreen because it would be out of date fairly quickly.  But an article on cooking substitutions or knitting tutorials would remain evergreen whether it was written yesterday or five years ago.  So the context of the type of article it is would be important.

From a CTR perspective, then things might be a bit different from an SEOs perspective, but then it would mostly depend on whether Google is showing the date directly in the search results or not.  But Google tends to show dates on searches where the freshness might be more relevant, or when the result is very recent, but tends to omit the dates on older content.  For many queries, especially ones where dates wouldn’t be relevant to the query, tend to have only 1-2 results on the page with dates, while the remainder are listed without any dates.

If you do update content, what some people are doing is leaving the original publish date since some CMS systems don’t handle updated dates well depending on your URL structure.  But some are adding a notation of “Updated on ___” to those articles so visitors can see at a glance how up to date the information is, even if they aren’t actively thinking about it.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
  • WhatsApp
  • Evernote
  • SMS
The following two tabs change content below.
  • Bio
  • Latest Posts
My Twitter profileMy Facebook profileMy Google+ profileMy LinkedIn profile

Jennifer Slegg

Founder & Editor at The SEM Post
Jennifer Slegg is a longtime speaker and expert in search engine marketing, working in the industry for almost 20 years. When she isn't sitting at her desk writing and working, she can be found grabbing a latte at her local Starbucks or planning her next trip to Disneyland. She regularly speaks at Pubcon, SMX, State of Search, Brighton SEO and more, and has been presenting at conferences for over a decade.
My Twitter profileMy Facebook profileMy Google+ profileMy LinkedIn profile

Latest posts by Jennifer Slegg (see all)

  • 2022 Update for Google Quality Rater Guidelines – Big YMYL Updates - August 1, 2022
  • Google Quality Rater Guidelines: The Low Quality 2021 Update - October 19, 2021
  • Rethinking Affiliate Sites With Google’s Product Review Update - April 23, 2021
  • New Google Quality Rater Guidelines, Update Adds Emphasis on Needs Met - October 16, 2020
  • Google Updates Experiment Statistics for Quality Raters - October 6, 2020

Filed Under: Google, SEO

Sign up for our newsletter


Comments

  1. Hashim Warren says

    January 23, 2016 at 1:25 am

    “But otherwise I don’t see any other ranking issue.”

    That is simply not accurate, no disrespect to the gentleman there

Trackbacks

  1. SearchCap: Google Core Explanation, Bing Updates & Bad Ads Report says:
    January 21, 2016 at 1:01 pm

    […] Should You Change Dates on Evergreen Content for SEO?, thesempost.com […]

Founder & Editor

Jennifer Slegg (2052)

Sign up for our daily news recap & weekly newsletter.


Follow us online

  • Facebook
  • Google+
  • Linkedin
  • Pinterest
  • Twitter

Latest News

2022 Update for Google Quality Rater Guidelines – Big YMYL Updates

We finally have the first Google Quality Rater Guidelines update of 2022, and like usual, it is … [Read More...]

Recent Posts

  • 2022 Update for Google Quality Rater Guidelines – Big YMYL Updates
  • Google Quality Rater Guidelines: The Low Quality 2021 Update
  • Rethinking Affiliate Sites With Google’s Product Review Update
  • New Google Quality Rater Guidelines, Update Adds Emphasis on Needs Met
  • Google Updates Experiment Statistics for Quality Raters
  • Analyzing “How Google Search Works” Changes from Google
  • Google Quality Rater Guidelines Update: New Introduction, Rater Bias & Political Affiliations
  • Google Updates Quality Rater Guidelines: Reputation for News Sites; Video Content Updates; Quality for Information Sites
  • Google Makes Major Changes to NoFollow, Adds Sponsored & UGC Tags
  • Google Updates Quality Rater Guidelines Targeting E-A-T, Page Quality & Interstitials

Categories

  • Affiliate Marketing
  • Amazon
  • Apple
  • Bing
  • Branding
  • Browsers
  • Chrome
  • Content Marketing
  • Design
  • Domains
  • DuckDuckGo
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Firefox
  • Foursquare
  • Google
    • Analytics
    • Google RankBrain
    • Quality Rater's Guidelines
  • History of Search
  • Industry Spotlight
  • Instagram
  • Internet Explorer
  • Links
  • Local
  • Mobile
  • Native Advertising
  • Other Search Engines
  • Pay Per Click
  • Pinterest
  • Publishers
  • Security
  • SEO
  • Snapchat
  • Social Media
  • State of the Industry
  • The SEM Post
  • Tools
  • Twitter
  • Uncategorized
  • User Experience
  • Video Marketing
  • Week in Review
  • Whitepapers
  • Wordpress
  • Yahoo
  • Yelp
  • YouTube
May 2025
MTWTFSS
« Aug  
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org

Copyright © 2025 · News Pro Theme On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in