• About Us
  • Contributors
  • Guides
  • Speaking Engagements
  • Write for The SEM Post
  • Submit a tip or contact us!
  • Newsletters

The SEM Post

Latest News About SEO, SEM, PPC & Search Engines

  • Google
  • SEO
  • Mobile
  • Local
  • Bing
  • Pay Per Click
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • State of the Industry
You are here: Home / Google / Signals Influence Date Google Shows in Search Results

Signals Influence Date Google Shows in Search Results

March 26, 2018 at 3:27 am PST By Jennifer Slegg

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
  • WhatsApp
  • Evernote
  • SMS

How does Google choose the date – if any – that is shown within the search results description?  While it is often the publish date, sometimes it is an updated date.  And why do some sites display a date for their dated content, while others do not?

The question came up on Twitter by someone noticing that Google seemed to be adjusting how they choose the date to display.  John Mueller responded, and it seems it isn’t as simple as Google picking one date or the other to display.  But rather, there are multiple signals being used.

We use a variety of signals to determine which date to show, or if it makes sense to show one at all; it’s not tied to one specific attribute.

Unfortunately, he doesn’t reveal the criteria for how Google chooses whether to display a date or not, or what date to be used in the search results.  Nor what other signals besides the dates themselves are being used to determine it.

For example, the Google Panda Algo Guide shows the publish date not the refresh date, despite there being a modified date tag being used:

But the person who asked John Mueller on Twitter noticed the opposite, that Google was pulling the modified date to display.  So it doesn’t seem that it is a universal change for all search results, but something specific to the site or page.

Because Google would have an original version of the page, it is possible that the modified date might only show if they also detect the page has been significantly updated, and not merely a date change.  This is a hot topic for sites that have evergreen content, especially when the content is still relevant, even if it is a few years old.  Gary Illyes has discussed about publishers who are faking dates as a way to make their content look fresher than it really is, and its impact on those sites and their dates in the search results.  So it makes sense if Google tracks it.

There have been instances where the dates Google chooses were not the best one.  For example, there was a bug where sites were displaying the date from a video embed in the search results, which resulted in some content seeming to be much older than it was, simply because the YouTube video embedded was an older one, until it was fixed.

So if you are trying to influence the date Google is using to display in the search results, or trying to get Google to display one, other than making sure you actually including the date in your source code Google can crawl and index, Google will use their own algo to make the decision.

We use a variety of signals to determine which date to show, or if it makes sense to show one at all; it's not tied to one specific attribute. Still, I'm curious to hear how you're serving dates on your pages! Do you have some examples? Thanks!

— John ☆.o(≧▽≦)o.☆ (@JohnMu) March 26, 2018

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
  • WhatsApp
  • Evernote
  • SMS
The following two tabs change content below.
  • Bio
  • Latest Posts
My Twitter profileMy Facebook profileMy Google+ profileMy LinkedIn profile

Jennifer Slegg

Founder & Editor at The SEM Post
Jennifer Slegg is a longtime speaker and expert in search engine marketing, working in the industry for almost 20 years. When she isn't sitting at her desk writing and working, she can be found grabbing a latte at her local Starbucks or planning her next trip to Disneyland. She regularly speaks at Pubcon, SMX, State of Search, Brighton SEO and more, and has been presenting at conferences for over a decade.
My Twitter profileMy Facebook profileMy Google+ profileMy LinkedIn profile

Latest posts by Jennifer Slegg (see all)

  • 2022 Update for Google Quality Rater Guidelines – Big YMYL Updates - August 1, 2022
  • Google Quality Rater Guidelines: The Low Quality 2021 Update - October 19, 2021
  • Rethinking Affiliate Sites With Google’s Product Review Update - April 23, 2021
  • New Google Quality Rater Guidelines, Update Adds Emphasis on Needs Met - October 16, 2020
  • Google Updates Experiment Statistics for Quality Raters - October 6, 2020

Filed Under: Google, SEO

Sign up for our newsletter


Founder & Editor

Jennifer Slegg (2052)

Sign up for our daily news recap & weekly newsletter.


Follow us online

  • Facebook
  • Google+
  • Linkedin
  • Pinterest
  • Twitter

Latest News

2022 Update for Google Quality Rater Guidelines – Big YMYL Updates

We finally have the first Google Quality Rater Guidelines update of 2022, and like usual, it is … [Read More...]

Recent Posts

  • 2022 Update for Google Quality Rater Guidelines – Big YMYL Updates
  • Google Quality Rater Guidelines: The Low Quality 2021 Update
  • Rethinking Affiliate Sites With Google’s Product Review Update
  • New Google Quality Rater Guidelines, Update Adds Emphasis on Needs Met
  • Google Updates Experiment Statistics for Quality Raters
  • Analyzing “How Google Search Works” Changes from Google
  • Google Quality Rater Guidelines Update: New Introduction, Rater Bias & Political Affiliations
  • Google Updates Quality Rater Guidelines: Reputation for News Sites; Video Content Updates; Quality for Information Sites
  • Google Makes Major Changes to NoFollow, Adds Sponsored & UGC Tags
  • Google Updates Quality Rater Guidelines Targeting E-A-T, Page Quality & Interstitials

Categories

  • Affiliate Marketing
  • Amazon
  • Apple
  • Bing
  • Branding
  • Browsers
  • Chrome
  • Content Marketing
  • Design
  • Domains
  • DuckDuckGo
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Firefox
  • Foursquare
  • Google
    • Analytics
    • Google RankBrain
    • Quality Rater's Guidelines
  • History of Search
  • Industry Spotlight
  • Instagram
  • Internet Explorer
  • Links
  • Local
  • Mobile
  • Native Advertising
  • Other Search Engines
  • Pay Per Click
  • Pinterest
  • Publishers
  • Security
  • SEO
  • Snapchat
  • Social Media
  • State of the Industry
  • The SEM Post
  • Tools
  • Twitter
  • Uncategorized
  • User Experience
  • Video Marketing
  • Week in Review
  • Whitepapers
  • Wordpress
  • Yahoo
  • Yelp
  • YouTube
December 2025
MTWTFSS
« Aug  
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031 

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org

Copyright © 2025 · News Pro Theme On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in