• About Us
  • Contributors
  • Guides
  • Speaking Engagements
  • Write for The SEM Post
  • Submit a tip or contact us!
  • Newsletters

The SEM Post

Latest News About SEO, SEM, PPC & Search Engines

  • Google
  • SEO
  • Mobile
  • Local
  • Bing
  • Pay Per Click
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • State of the Industry
You are here: Home / Google / Using Rel Canonical on All Pages for Duplicate Content Protection

Using Rel Canonical on All Pages for Duplicate Content Protection

December 3, 2015 at 4:20 am PST By Jennifer Slegg

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
  • WhatsApp
  • Evernote
  • SMS

rel canonical duplicate contentIn this week’s Google Webmaster Hangout, a question was raised about using rel canonical across an entire site, with each page using the rel canonical to point to itself, in order to prevent the possibility of duplicate content being indexed.

The question asked was “Is it still okay to put rel canonical on every single page pointing to itself, just in order to avoid duplicate parameters and things like that?”

John Mueller responded yes, and the person then clarified to ask if it matters if it is site wide across a million pages.

It doesn’t matter how many pages.  You just need to make sure that it points to the clean URL version, that you’re not pointing to the parameter version accidentally,  or that you’re not always pointing to the homepage accidentally, because those are the types of mistakes we try and catch.

You can do that across millions of pages and we’ll try to take that into account.

Sometimes URLs with URL parameters – such as parameters used for tracking or advertising – end up being indexed.  And while duplicate content isn’t a penalty per say, there is the possibility it can cause issues, particularly if a URL parameter URL ends up being linked, which often happens when others link to a page they may have originally clicked through from a social media site or ad campaign.   Other reasons we see this being used is for www versus non-www (although preferred domain in Google Search Console should definitely be used for this), pagination, depending on how your server handles upper and lower case characters within the URL, as well as for PageRank reasons.

That said, it isn’t necessary to use rel canonical across every page on a site.  But if you make extensive use of parameters, it might make sense to do this site wide as a preventative measure.

Using rel canonical for duplicate content issues isn’t new, but it is nice to have the clarification that it wouldn’t cause issues even if deployed across millions of sites when each page is canonicalized to itself.

Google also released a blog post on best practices for using rel canonical a couple of years ago, detailing how to use to properly as well as some of the issues they see in the implementation.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
  • WhatsApp
  • Evernote
  • SMS
The following two tabs change content below.
  • Bio
  • Latest Posts
My Twitter profileMy Facebook profileMy Google+ profileMy LinkedIn profile

Jennifer Slegg

Founder & Editor at The SEM Post
Jennifer Slegg is a longtime speaker and expert in search engine marketing, working in the industry for almost 20 years. When she isn't sitting at her desk writing and working, she can be found grabbing a latte at her local Starbucks or planning her next trip to Disneyland. She regularly speaks at Pubcon, SMX, State of Search, Brighton SEO and more, and has been presenting at conferences for over a decade.
My Twitter profileMy Facebook profileMy Google+ profileMy LinkedIn profile

Latest posts by Jennifer Slegg (see all)

  • 2022 Update for Google Quality Rater Guidelines – Big YMYL Updates - August 1, 2022
  • Google Quality Rater Guidelines: The Low Quality 2021 Update - October 19, 2021
  • Rethinking Affiliate Sites With Google’s Product Review Update - April 23, 2021
  • New Google Quality Rater Guidelines, Update Adds Emphasis on Needs Met - October 16, 2020
  • Google Updates Experiment Statistics for Quality Raters - October 6, 2020

Filed Under: Google, SEO

Sign up for our newsletter


Comments

  1. Tom B says

    December 7, 2015 at 6:23 am

    Does that mean content such as: https://www.originalsite.com/blog/read-this-now.html should have a canonical tag leading to https://www.originalsite.com/blog/read-this-now.html…

    …while a duplicate post at https://www.syndicatedsite.com/blog/blatant-copy-of-read-this-now.html should use https://www.syndicatedsite.com/blog/blatant-copy-of-read-this-now.html as its canonical?

    Because that seems to defeat the purpose of the canonical.

    -TB

    • Jennifer Slegg says

      December 7, 2015 at 1:12 pm

      No, it would mean using rel canonical to itself on the originalsite example, while the syndicatedsite would canonical to originalsite.

Trackbacks

  1. SearchCap: Google Penguin Delay, Search Channels & Google Map Maker says:
    December 3, 2015 at 1:01 pm

    […] Using Rel Canonical on All Pages for Duplicate Content Protection, thesempost.com […]

Founder & Editor

Jennifer Slegg (2052)

Sign up for our daily news recap & weekly newsletter.


Follow us online

  • Facebook
  • Google+
  • Linkedin
  • Pinterest
  • Twitter

Latest News

2022 Update for Google Quality Rater Guidelines – Big YMYL Updates

We finally have the first Google Quality Rater Guidelines update of 2022, and like usual, it is … [Read More...]

Recent Posts

  • 2022 Update for Google Quality Rater Guidelines – Big YMYL Updates
  • Google Quality Rater Guidelines: The Low Quality 2021 Update
  • Rethinking Affiliate Sites With Google’s Product Review Update
  • New Google Quality Rater Guidelines, Update Adds Emphasis on Needs Met
  • Google Updates Experiment Statistics for Quality Raters
  • Analyzing “How Google Search Works” Changes from Google
  • Google Quality Rater Guidelines Update: New Introduction, Rater Bias & Political Affiliations
  • Google Updates Quality Rater Guidelines: Reputation for News Sites; Video Content Updates; Quality for Information Sites
  • Google Makes Major Changes to NoFollow, Adds Sponsored & UGC Tags
  • Google Updates Quality Rater Guidelines Targeting E-A-T, Page Quality & Interstitials

Categories

  • Affiliate Marketing
  • Amazon
  • Apple
  • Bing
  • Branding
  • Browsers
  • Chrome
  • Content Marketing
  • Design
  • Domains
  • DuckDuckGo
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Firefox
  • Foursquare
  • Google
    • Analytics
    • Google RankBrain
    • Quality Rater's Guidelines
  • History of Search
  • Industry Spotlight
  • Instagram
  • Internet Explorer
  • Links
  • Local
  • Mobile
  • Native Advertising
  • Other Search Engines
  • Pay Per Click
  • Pinterest
  • Publishers
  • Security
  • SEO
  • Snapchat
  • Social Media
  • State of the Industry
  • The SEM Post
  • Tools
  • Twitter
  • Uncategorized
  • User Experience
  • Video Marketing
  • Week in Review
  • Whitepapers
  • Wordpress
  • Yahoo
  • Yelp
  • YouTube
March 2023
MTWTFSS
« Aug  
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031 

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org

Copyright © 2023 · News Pro Theme On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in