• About Us
  • Contributors
  • Guides
  • Speaking Engagements
  • Write for The SEM Post
  • Submit a tip or contact us!
  • Newsletters

The SEM Post

Latest News About SEO, SEM, PPC & Search Engines

  • Google
  • SEO
  • Mobile
  • Local
  • Bing
  • Pay Per Click
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • State of the Industry
You are here: Home / Google / Valid HTML Not a Ranking Factor But Invalid Can Cause These Issues

Valid HTML Not a Ranking Factor But Invalid Can Cause These Issues

January 29, 2016 at 4:06 am PST By Jennifer Slegg

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
  • WhatsApp
  • Evernote
  • SMS

valid html rankingIn the changes yesterday that Google made to their webmaster guidelines, Google changed the phrasing of “clear HTML” to “valid HTML.”  So as expected, that phrase got a lot of attention, especially from those who advocate for compliant W3C validation, which Google links to.  But is valid HTML a ranking factor?

In today’s webmaster hangout, John Mueller from Google confirms that while using valid HTML is good, it is not a ranking factor.  That said, it could lead to other issues that do affect SEO.

So it’s not directly a ranking factor.  It’s not the sense that if your site is not using HTML we will remove it from the index, because I think then we would have pretty empty search results.  But there are a few aspects there that do come into play.

So, on the one hand, if a site is really broken HTML, and its something that we see very rarely, then it’s really hard for us to crawl and index the content because we can’t pick it up properly.

The other two aspects which are kind of newer is with regards to structured data.  Sometimes it is really hard to pick up the structured data properly if the HTML is broken completely, so you can easily use a validator for structured data to actually understand that really well.  The other thing is with regards to mobile devices and in general cross browser support.  If you have broken HTML then that’s something that’s harder to render on newer devices.

So those are kind of two aspects that kind of come into play there, which is why we kept that point.  I think it used to say use correct HTML and we decided well correct doesn’t actually say anything properly, so we might as well just call it valid HTML and I think we even pointed at the validator.  And it’s not that its a requirement that you must use valid HTML and we’ll remove you from search if you don’t, but it really makes it a lot easier for you to diagnose issues and for us to extract things like structured data for example and to recognize that it is actually mobile friendly.

This will probably be a bit disappointing to those who offer valid HTML as a service.  But if Google started to give a ranking boost solely based on valid HTML, it would definitely be more of a hardship to small site owners who lack the HTML experience to make code valid.

The structured data part makes sense, and I do notice webmasters are more inclined to fix broken structured data than broken HTML, especially when they are wanting special features like reviews or a search box to show next their their site in the search results.

Here is the video:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
  • WhatsApp
  • Evernote
  • SMS
The following two tabs change content below.
  • Bio
  • Latest Posts
My Twitter profileMy Facebook profileMy Google+ profileMy LinkedIn profile

Jennifer Slegg

Founder & Editor at The SEM Post
Jennifer Slegg is a longtime speaker and expert in search engine marketing, working in the industry for almost 20 years. When she isn't sitting at her desk writing and working, she can be found grabbing a latte at her local Starbucks or planning her next trip to Disneyland. She regularly speaks at Pubcon, SMX, State of Search, Brighton SEO and more, and has been presenting at conferences for over a decade.
My Twitter profileMy Facebook profileMy Google+ profileMy LinkedIn profile

Latest posts by Jennifer Slegg (see all)

  • Google Quality Rater Guidelines Update: New Introduction, Rater Bias & Political Affiliations - December 6, 2019
  • Google Updates Quality Rater Guidelines: Reputation for News Sites; Video Content Updates; Quality for Information Sites - September 13, 2019
  • Google Makes Major Changes to NoFollow, Adds Sponsored & UGC Tags - September 10, 2019
  • Google Updates Quality Rater Guidelines Targeting E-A-T, Page Quality & Interstitials - May 17, 2019
  • Google Local Service Ads Display Pricing Estimates for Specific Locations - August 31, 2018

Filed Under: Google, SEO

Sign up for our newsletter


Trackbacks

  1. SearchCap: Republican Debate & Google, AdWords iOS App & Adobe Report says:
    January 29, 2016 at 1:00 pm

    […] Valid HTML Not a Ranking Factor But Can Cause These Issues, thesempost.com […]

Founder & Editor

Jennifer Slegg (2046)

Sign up for our daily news recap & weekly newsletter.


Follow us online

  • Facebook
  • Google+
  • Linkedin
  • Pinterest
  • Twitter

Latest News

Google Quality Rater Guidelines Update: New Introduction, Rater Bias & Political Affiliations

Google has released a brand new version of the Quality Rater Guidelines, the third one this year.  … [Read More...]

Recent Posts

  • Google Quality Rater Guidelines Update: New Introduction, Rater Bias & Political Affiliations
  • Google Updates Quality Rater Guidelines: Reputation for News Sites; Video Content Updates; Quality for Information Sites
  • Google Makes Major Changes to NoFollow, Adds Sponsored & UGC Tags
  • Google Updates Quality Rater Guidelines Targeting E-A-T, Page Quality & Interstitials
  • Google Local Service Ads Display Pricing Estimates for Specific Locations
  • Google Testing “Relevant History” Section in Mobile Search Results
  • Google Converts PDFs, DOCs, XLS etc into HTML for Indexing
  • Why Google Shows Featured Snippets With Images from Another Site
  • How to Download Links Report in New Google Search Console
  • Google: Avoid Including Redirected URLs in Sitemaps

Categories

  • Affiliate Marketing
  • Amazon
  • Apple
  • Bing
  • Branding
  • Browsers
  • Chrome
  • Content Marketing
  • Design
  • Domains
  • DuckDuckGo
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Firefox
  • Foursquare
  • Google
    • Analytics
    • Google RankBrain
    • Quality Rater's Guidelines
  • History of Search
  • Industry Spotlight
  • Instagram
  • Internet Explorer
  • Links
  • Local
  • Mobile
  • Native Advertising
  • Other Search Engines
  • Pay Per Click
  • Pinterest
  • Publishers
  • Security
  • SEO
  • Snapchat
  • Social Media
  • State of the Industry
  • The SEM Post
  • Tools
  • Twitter
  • Uncategorized
  • User Experience
  • Video Marketing
  • Week in Review
  • Whitepapers
  • Wordpress
  • Yahoo
  • Yelp
  • YouTube
December 2019
MTWTFSS
« Sep  
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031 

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org

Copyright © 2019 · News Pro Theme On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in