• About Us
  • Contributors
  • Guides
  • Speaking Engagements
  • Write for The SEM Post
  • Submit a tip or contact us!
  • Newsletters

The SEM Post

Latest News About SEO, SEM, PPC & Search Engines

  • Google
  • SEO
  • Mobile
  • Local
  • Bing
  • Pay Per Click
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • State of the Industry
You are here: Home / SEO / Why Wikipedia Went Secure & Why All Websites Should Do The Same

Why Wikipedia Went Secure & Why All Websites Should Do The Same

November 25, 2015 at 5:17 am PST By Jennifer Slegg

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
  • WhatsApp
  • Evernote
  • SMS

wikipedia secureIt has been no secret that Google has been pushing hard to see more websites go secure, complete with the HTTPS ranking boost to encourage more sites to do so.  Jimmy Wales was recently interviewed and contributed some of his own thoughts on why encryption is so important, and gives insight into why more webmasters should go secure.  And in fact, he also wants to see every site encrypted.

Newspapers

He feels it is crucial for newspapers to go secure in order to support freedom of speech and freedom of expression.

“If you’re a newspaper that cares about freedom of expression and freedom of speech, it’s probably not good to allow the government of the Maldives to be profiling people in their communities based on what news stories they’re reading, and if you aren’t secure you’re allowing that to happen – it’s a really important point,” he says.

New York Times also published an opinion piece last year urging news sites to go secure, although ironically, they are not yet secure themselves.

Controversial topics

Along with news, going secure means governments cannot know what news articles people are reading within their country, and target them because of it.  This was actually a driving force behind Wikipedia’s decision to switch to SSL.

It’s a common misconception that SSL is only important when websites are handling private data, however this was not the reason Wikipedia was transitioned.Instead, it was the ability for governments with poor human rights records to tell when citizens were reading articles covering controversial or anti-government topics, and arresting them as a result. It may seem like something out of dystopian fiction, but Wales is adamant that this situation occurs, and says he is aware of particular Wikipedia editors being affected.

Pages Cannot Be Selectively Blocked

Another aspect people might not be aware of is that HTTPS means that specific pages on a site cannot be blocked.  So a country would be unable to censor specific results on a page.

This is also the reason Wales believes that China blocked Wikipedia again, since they could no longer censor citizens from specific pages on the site.

The reason for this sudden re-blocking is likely to be that under SSL, China wouldn’t have the option to selectively block particular Wikipedia entries: it forces the country to take an all-or-nothing approach.

Going secure means that while someone could see that a person is on Wikipedia, they are unable to determine which pages they are actually visiting.

“With https, the only thing that the Chinese authorities can see today is if you’re talking to Wikipedia or not, they can’t see which pages you’re joining, which means they no longer have the ability to filter on a page-by-page basis, so they can’t block just Tiananmen Square,” says Wales. “They now have a very stark choice: the entire country of China can do without Wikipedia, or they can accept all of Wikipedia.”

The article is a fascinating read and raises some interesting points about why websites need to be going secure.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
  • WhatsApp
  • Evernote
  • SMS
The following two tabs change content below.
  • Bio
  • Latest Posts
My Twitter profileMy Facebook profileMy Google+ profileMy LinkedIn profile

Jennifer Slegg

Founder & Editor at The SEM Post
Jennifer Slegg is a longtime speaker and expert in search engine marketing, working in the industry for almost 20 years. When she isn't sitting at her desk writing and working, she can be found grabbing a latte at her local Starbucks or planning her next trip to Disneyland. She regularly speaks at Pubcon, SMX, State of Search, Brighton SEO and more, and has been presenting at conferences for over a decade.
My Twitter profileMy Facebook profileMy Google+ profileMy LinkedIn profile

Latest posts by Jennifer Slegg (see all)

  • New Google Quality Rater Guidelines, Update Adds Emphasis on Needs Met - October 16, 2020
  • Google Updates Experiment Statistics for Quality Raters - October 6, 2020
  • Analyzing “How Google Search Works” Changes from Google - July 8, 2020
  • Google Quality Rater Guidelines Update: New Introduction, Rater Bias & Political Affiliations - December 6, 2019
  • Google Updates Quality Rater Guidelines: Reputation for News Sites; Video Content Updates; Quality for Information Sites - September 13, 2019

Filed Under: SEO

Sign up for our newsletter


Comments

  1. MamboMan says

    November 25, 2015 at 6:12 am

    This really doesn’t convince ME to go full SSL.

    Oh, it’s on the project list, but not even prioritized.

  2. Stefan Misaras says

    November 25, 2015 at 6:53 am

    I’ve been contemplating going secure on my website, which is also a blog, but I’m wondering if it’s worth it. Question for you, Jennifer: would you go secure on this website? Do you think it is beneficial? Also, would you consider it is a good investment (because it actually costs money + renewing it yearly)?

    • Jennifer Slegg says

      November 25, 2015 at 6:56 am

      Yes, I plan on switching this site over, just hasn’t been a priority with conference travel the last few months. We definitely are seeing more and more in this industry go secure, even after the initial “OMG, rank boost, do it now!” I do think it is also important for super competitive market areas, as Google has said that it acts like a tie-breaker, which can be all a site needs to edge out another site for a top spot.

  3. Bruce says

    November 26, 2015 at 2:51 am

    Something here “does not compute.”

    In April, 2015, the PCI Security Standards Council instructed all who conducted financial transactions online to refrain from implementing SSL and Early TLS on new sites and for old sites to migrate to TLS 1.2 by the end of June 2016.

    I’ve been given to understand by our Webmaster that provided websites are going through a financial provider, such as WorldPay or PayPal, that they won’t need to be concerned with making this change. But from your post, it sounds like SSL is unrelated to online sales.

    What’s going on?

    • Jennifer Slegg says

      November 29, 2015 at 5:02 am

      Google wants to see all sites go secure, so that is why they implemented the ranking boost for switching to HTTPS. It is not just about financial information, such as credit cards, but about security for the user.

      From Google’s support docs on why:

      1. Encryption—encrypting the exchanged data to keep it secure from eavesdroppers. That means that while the user is browsing a website, nobody can “listen” to their conversations, track their activities across multiple pages, or steal their information.
      2. Data integrity—data cannot be modified or corrupted during transfer, intentionally or otherwise, without being detected.
      3. Authentication—proves that your users communicate with the intended website. It protects against man-in-the-middle attacks and builds user trust, which translates into other business benefits.

Founder & Editor

Jennifer Slegg (2049)

Sign up for our daily news recap & weekly newsletter.


Follow us online

  • Facebook
  • Google+
  • Linkedin
  • Pinterest
  • Twitter

Latest News

New Google Quality Rater Guidelines, Update Adds Emphasis on Needs Met

Google has released a brand-new Google quality rater guidelines, coming close to a year after the … [Read More...]

Recent Posts

  • New Google Quality Rater Guidelines, Update Adds Emphasis on Needs Met
  • Google Updates Experiment Statistics for Quality Raters
  • Analyzing “How Google Search Works” Changes from Google
  • Google Quality Rater Guidelines Update: New Introduction, Rater Bias & Political Affiliations
  • Google Updates Quality Rater Guidelines: Reputation for News Sites; Video Content Updates; Quality for Information Sites
  • Google Makes Major Changes to NoFollow, Adds Sponsored & UGC Tags
  • Google Updates Quality Rater Guidelines Targeting E-A-T, Page Quality & Interstitials
  • Google Local Service Ads Display Pricing Estimates for Specific Locations
  • Google Testing “Relevant History” Section in Mobile Search Results
  • Google Converts PDFs, DOCs, XLS etc into HTML for Indexing

Categories

  • Affiliate Marketing
  • Amazon
  • Apple
  • Bing
  • Branding
  • Browsers
  • Chrome
  • Content Marketing
  • Design
  • Domains
  • DuckDuckGo
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Firefox
  • Foursquare
  • Google
    • Analytics
    • Google RankBrain
    • Quality Rater's Guidelines
  • History of Search
  • Industry Spotlight
  • Instagram
  • Internet Explorer
  • Links
  • Local
  • Mobile
  • Native Advertising
  • Other Search Engines
  • Pay Per Click
  • Pinterest
  • Publishers
  • Security
  • SEO
  • Snapchat
  • Social Media
  • State of the Industry
  • The SEM Post
  • Tools
  • Twitter
  • Uncategorized
  • User Experience
  • Video Marketing
  • Week in Review
  • Whitepapers
  • Wordpress
  • Yahoo
  • Yelp
  • YouTube
February 2021
MTWTFSS
« Oct  
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org

Copyright © 2021 · News Pro Theme On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in