• About Us
  • Contributors
  • Guides
  • Speaking Engagements
  • Write for The SEM Post
  • Submit a tip or contact us!
  • Newsletters

The SEM Post

Latest News About SEO, SEM, PPC & Search Engines

  • Google
  • SEO
  • Mobile
  • Local
  • Bing
  • Pay Per Click
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • State of the Industry
You are here: Home / Google / Google: Do Not Ask For Links

Google: Do Not Ask For Links

July 7, 2015 at 5:03 am PST By Jennifer Slegg

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
  • WhatsApp
  • Evernote
  • SMS

google do not ask linksGoogle published a blog post on the Portuguese Webmaster Blog reminding webmasters of quality links, what they should do if they were penalized for links and how to request reinclusion.

However, one thing definitely sticks out in this blog post – and that is Google stating that webmasters should not ask for links: não compre, venda, troque ou peça links

While the blog post isn’t in English, both Google Translate and Bing Translation confirm the translation.

google do not buy linksWhy wasn’t this posted on the other Webmaster blogs too?  Usually in these cases, it is due to a major link network being removed in either the same country or in the same language, although I haven’t seen reports yet.  But it is almost identical to a blog post that they added to the same webmaster blog just over a year ago, also by  Diogo Botelho from Search Quality & Webmaster Outreach at Google.

It is worth noting that the line about do not ask for links was included a year ago too, but no one happened to notice the translation at the time.

Comparing it to Google’s Link Schemes page in the Google Search Console quality guidelines, it makes no mention specifically that webmasters shouldn’t be asking for links, but does make reference to buying, selling and exchanging links.

Buying or selling links that pass PageRank. This includes exchanging money for links, or posts that contain links; exchanging goods or services for links; or sending someone a “free” product in exchange for them writing about it and including a link

Is the reference about not asking for links targeting those who are using other means to solicit links, such as the recent Thumbtack case where they were awarding points for links, in a move they said initially was not buying or selling links and was perfectly fine?  Obviously since this language was in there from Google’s post a year ago, it wasn’t specifically targeting Thumbtack, but it could be targeting similar situations which are still pretty prevalent despite many staying well clear of them.

All in all, not asking for links is probably a good strategy for beginner SEOs or webmasters who might not know the ins and outs of what makes a legitimate link and what makes a sketchy one, since many of them still fall for “link exchanges” and selling footer or sidebar space.  And this post is definitely targeting those who are either recovering from a link penalty or fixing one, so it probably makes sense to not throw anymore potentially sketchy ones into the mix by asking for new ones.

However, experienced SEOs are definitely well versed in the nuances of link building to ask for quality links from the right sources without worrying about it harming the site.

H/T: Aaron Wall

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
  • WhatsApp
  • Evernote
  • SMS
The following two tabs change content below.
  • Bio
  • Latest Posts
My Twitter profileMy Facebook profileMy Google+ profileMy LinkedIn profile

Jennifer Slegg

Founder & Editor at The SEM Post
Jennifer Slegg is a longtime speaker and expert in search engine marketing, working in the industry for almost 20 years. When she isn't sitting at her desk writing and working, she can be found grabbing a latte at her local Starbucks or planning her next trip to Disneyland. She regularly speaks at Pubcon, SMX, State of Search, Brighton SEO and more, and has been presenting at conferences for over a decade.
My Twitter profileMy Facebook profileMy Google+ profileMy LinkedIn profile

Latest posts by Jennifer Slegg (see all)

  • 2022 Update for Google Quality Rater Guidelines – Big YMYL Updates - August 1, 2022
  • Google Quality Rater Guidelines: The Low Quality 2021 Update - October 19, 2021
  • Rethinking Affiliate Sites With Google’s Product Review Update - April 23, 2021
  • New Google Quality Rater Guidelines, Update Adds Emphasis on Needs Met - October 16, 2020
  • Google Updates Experiment Statistics for Quality Raters - October 6, 2020

Filed Under: Google

Sign up for our newsletter


Comments

  1. Marie Haynes says

    July 7, 2015 at 8:25 am

    I feel like this is a translation issue. John Mueller has said several times in Webmaster Forum hangouts that it can be ok to ask for links. Here are a couple of examples:

    https://t.co/3ph9UxIKvT – John was asked about a new site that was starting over and whether they could contact sites that used to link to their old url and ask for a link to the new site. He said “I think that would be fine.”

    https://t.co/98x8NrJOHl – John was asked if it is ok to reach out to people and ask them to link and he said, “In some cases that definitely makes sense.”

    As with any SEO type of tactic, I’m sure that this could be overdone to the point where it goes against the Quality Guidelines but I don’t feel that there is anything wrong with asking someone to link to your website.

    • Barry Schwartz says

      July 7, 2015 at 2:13 pm

      I do agree with you on that. Seems way off but communication isn’t Google’s best characteristic.

      • Gianluca says

        July 8, 2015 at 6:55 am

        This is the problem of using Google Translate for localizing content

Founder & Editor

Jennifer Slegg (2052)

Sign up for our daily news recap & weekly newsletter.


Follow us online

  • Facebook
  • Google+
  • Linkedin
  • Pinterest
  • Twitter

Latest News

2022 Update for Google Quality Rater Guidelines – Big YMYL Updates

We finally have the first Google Quality Rater Guidelines update of 2022, and like usual, it is … [Read More...]

Recent Posts

  • 2022 Update for Google Quality Rater Guidelines – Big YMYL Updates
  • Google Quality Rater Guidelines: The Low Quality 2021 Update
  • Rethinking Affiliate Sites With Google’s Product Review Update
  • New Google Quality Rater Guidelines, Update Adds Emphasis on Needs Met
  • Google Updates Experiment Statistics for Quality Raters
  • Analyzing “How Google Search Works” Changes from Google
  • Google Quality Rater Guidelines Update: New Introduction, Rater Bias & Political Affiliations
  • Google Updates Quality Rater Guidelines: Reputation for News Sites; Video Content Updates; Quality for Information Sites
  • Google Makes Major Changes to NoFollow, Adds Sponsored & UGC Tags
  • Google Updates Quality Rater Guidelines Targeting E-A-T, Page Quality & Interstitials

Categories

  • Affiliate Marketing
  • Amazon
  • Apple
  • Bing
  • Branding
  • Browsers
  • Chrome
  • Content Marketing
  • Design
  • Domains
  • DuckDuckGo
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Firefox
  • Foursquare
  • Google
    • Analytics
    • Google RankBrain
    • Quality Rater's Guidelines
  • History of Search
  • Industry Spotlight
  • Instagram
  • Internet Explorer
  • Links
  • Local
  • Mobile
  • Native Advertising
  • Other Search Engines
  • Pay Per Click
  • Pinterest
  • Publishers
  • Security
  • SEO
  • Snapchat
  • Social Media
  • State of the Industry
  • The SEM Post
  • Tools
  • Twitter
  • Uncategorized
  • User Experience
  • Video Marketing
  • Week in Review
  • Whitepapers
  • Wordpress
  • Yahoo
  • Yelp
  • YouTube
May 2025
MTWTFSS
« Aug  
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org

Copyright © 2025 · News Pro Theme On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in