• About Us
  • Contributors
  • Guides
  • Speaking Engagements
  • Write for The SEM Post
  • Submit a tip or contact us!
  • Newsletters

The SEM Post

Latest News About SEO, SEM, PPC & Search Engines

  • Google
  • SEO
  • Mobile
  • Local
  • Bing
  • Pay Per Click
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • State of the Industry
You are here: Home / Google / Google Loses Appeal; Must Remove Right to Be Forgotten Worldwide

Google Loses Appeal; Must Remove Right to Be Forgotten Worldwide

September 22, 2015 at 4:09 am PST By Jennifer Slegg

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
  • WhatsApp
  • Evernote
  • SMS

google france appealGoogle has lost the appeal in France that requires the search engine to remove “Right to be Forgotten” removed results from all versions of Google – including Google.com – instead of just the Google results in the EU.

Earlier this year, the CNIL (Commission Nationale de l’Informatique et des Libertés) ordered Google to start applying the “Right to be Forgotten” removals across all versions of the search engine, not just results displayed within the EU.

Currently when Google removes a search result under the “Right to be Forgotten”, they only remove it from various EU versions of Google, which includes Google.fr, the Google version for France. But for those searching outside of the EU, they would see those removed results.

This is one of the reasons given by CNIL – that it is too easy to circumvent.

If this right was limited to some extensions, it could be easily circumvented: in order to find the delisted result, it would be sufficient to search on another extension (e.g. searching in France using google.com), namely to use another form of access to the processing. This would equate stripping away the efficiency of this right, and applying variable rights to individuals depending on the internet user who queries the search engine and not on the data subject.

Google’s argument as that this law should only apply to search results in the EU since it is not a global law, but rather one for the EU. They see it as a form of censorship that impacts the world. However, CNIL argues that they do not see it this way, but that Google should comply as part of doing business within Europe.

Finally, contrary to what Google has stated, this decision does not show any willingness on the part of the CNIL to apply French law extraterritorially. It simply requests full observance of European legislation by non European players offering their services in Europe.

Google now must immediately comply with the CNIL’s decision to remove all of the “Right to be Forgotten” results for all citizens of France across Google worldwide. If Google refuses to do so, they can be hit with sanctions as well as fines that increase for repeat offenses. This only applies for “Right to be Forgotten” results where citizens of France are the subject of the removals. This doesn’t apply to other EU countries, however some could follow suit.

Google does not have any way to appeal this, and the next move by France would be sanctions and fines for non-compliance by Google. But the fines could be hefty – which could go as high as between 2-5% of Google’s global operating costs. Their only option at this point is to challenge the fine later, as there is not another legal avenue for appeal.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
  • WhatsApp
  • Evernote
  • SMS
The following two tabs change content below.
  • Bio
  • Latest Posts
My Twitter profileMy Facebook profileMy Google+ profileMy LinkedIn profile

Jennifer Slegg

Founder & Editor at The SEM Post
Jennifer Slegg is a longtime speaker and expert in search engine marketing, working in the industry for almost 20 years. When she isn't sitting at her desk writing and working, she can be found grabbing a latte at her local Starbucks or planning her next trip to Disneyland. She regularly speaks at Pubcon, SMX, State of Search, Brighton SEO and more, and has been presenting at conferences for over a decade.
My Twitter profileMy Facebook profileMy Google+ profileMy LinkedIn profile

Latest posts by Jennifer Slegg (see all)

  • 2022 Update for Google Quality Rater Guidelines – Big YMYL Updates - August 1, 2022
  • Google Quality Rater Guidelines: The Low Quality 2021 Update - October 19, 2021
  • Rethinking Affiliate Sites With Google’s Product Review Update - April 23, 2021
  • New Google Quality Rater Guidelines, Update Adds Emphasis on Needs Met - October 16, 2020
  • Google Updates Experiment Statistics for Quality Raters - October 6, 2020

Filed Under: Google

Sign up for our newsletter


Comments

  1. Doc Sheldon says

    September 22, 2015 at 4:10 pm

    There is one other option, of course… however unlikely it may be that Google would choose it. Simply thumb their nose and kill google.fr. I doubt there’s even a 2% chance of them doing so (although I’m willing to bet it’s an option that’s been discussed behind closed doors), but allow France or any other country to dictate what can be seen in other countries is totally unacceptable. If the French don’t want the French to see any version of Google besides google.fr, then let THEM worry about it. They can block access – I’m sure there must be some Chinese censors that should show them how.
    Ah, but then, their own populace would be up in arms… SO much better for the French politicos to put the onus on Google!
    Let them eat Bing!

Founder & Editor

Jennifer Slegg (2052)

Sign up for our daily news recap & weekly newsletter.


Follow us online

  • Facebook
  • Google+
  • Linkedin
  • Pinterest
  • Twitter

Latest News

2022 Update for Google Quality Rater Guidelines – Big YMYL Updates

We finally have the first Google Quality Rater Guidelines update of 2022, and like usual, it is … [Read More...]

Recent Posts

  • 2022 Update for Google Quality Rater Guidelines – Big YMYL Updates
  • Google Quality Rater Guidelines: The Low Quality 2021 Update
  • Rethinking Affiliate Sites With Google’s Product Review Update
  • New Google Quality Rater Guidelines, Update Adds Emphasis on Needs Met
  • Google Updates Experiment Statistics for Quality Raters
  • Analyzing “How Google Search Works” Changes from Google
  • Google Quality Rater Guidelines Update: New Introduction, Rater Bias & Political Affiliations
  • Google Updates Quality Rater Guidelines: Reputation for News Sites; Video Content Updates; Quality for Information Sites
  • Google Makes Major Changes to NoFollow, Adds Sponsored & UGC Tags
  • Google Updates Quality Rater Guidelines Targeting E-A-T, Page Quality & Interstitials

Categories

  • Affiliate Marketing
  • Amazon
  • Apple
  • Bing
  • Branding
  • Browsers
  • Chrome
  • Content Marketing
  • Design
  • Domains
  • DuckDuckGo
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Firefox
  • Foursquare
  • Google
    • Analytics
    • Google RankBrain
    • Quality Rater's Guidelines
  • History of Search
  • Industry Spotlight
  • Instagram
  • Internet Explorer
  • Links
  • Local
  • Mobile
  • Native Advertising
  • Other Search Engines
  • Pay Per Click
  • Pinterest
  • Publishers
  • Security
  • SEO
  • Snapchat
  • Social Media
  • State of the Industry
  • The SEM Post
  • Tools
  • Twitter
  • Uncategorized
  • User Experience
  • Video Marketing
  • Week in Review
  • Whitepapers
  • Wordpress
  • Yahoo
  • Yelp
  • YouTube
July 2025
MTWTFSS
« Aug  
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031 

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org

Copyright © 2025 · News Pro Theme On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in