• About Us
  • Contributors
  • Guides
  • Speaking Engagements
  • Write for The SEM Post
  • Submit a tip or contact us!
  • Newsletters

The SEM Post

Latest News About SEO, SEM, PPC & Search Engines

  • Google
  • SEO
  • Mobile
  • Local
  • Bing
  • Pay Per Click
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • State of the Industry
You are here: Home / Google / Is the Google update mostly SSL implementation issues?

Is the Google update mostly SSL implementation issues?

August 11, 2014 at 12:03 pm PST By Jennifer Slegg

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
  • WhatsApp
  • Evernote
  • SMS

There has been a lot of chatter about a possible Google update happening late Friday and over the weekend.  However, while there were two UK link networks that were penalized, it is unclear if there was actually an update or if it is fallout from the panic SSL switches that many websites are in the midst of changing to SSL.

When Google announced that websites would have a ranking boost for utilizing SSL, there seemed to be a mad rush of websites scrambling to switch over to HTTPS.  But along with the switchover, some companies were running into technical difficulties, the largest one being the insecure warnings that are popping up in web browsers when someone tries to visit a site.

There are many sites running into this issue.  It isn’t just smaller sites that are having issues… The Guardian is also one.

guardian sslAnd the warning is just as dire for Firefox users.

firefox sslThe issue is usually caused when there is a mismatch between the URL the certificate is issued for and the URL the person tries to visit – this can happen even for canonical issues, where the certificate is for www.example.com and someone tries to visit example.com.  Some certificates can be issues with both variations, as well as the server IP address, to try and prevent these issues from occurring.

Google Webmaster Tools is also noticing the problems and is sending out crawl error emails to those who are affected by certificate problems, so this is definitely going to have an impact on the search results.

There is something definitely going on in the search results, and a couple people reported that some penalties were lifted. And Mozcast is also showing changes.

mozcast aug 11

But how much is truly an update and how much is a result if poor SSL implementation?

“I haven’t really seen much change in the sites that I monitor,” says Marie Haynes of HIS Web Marketing.  “There is possibly a slight decrease in one site that has seen multiple increases with Panda refreshes since the May 20th Panda 4.0 update.  And again, possibly a slight increase in traffic for one site that has been working on fixing Panda issues.  But, there really is nothing conclusive.  I have seen no change in sites that are waiting for a Penguin refresh.”

I also reached out to Google but they responded they have no comment.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
  • WhatsApp
  • Evernote
  • SMS
The following two tabs change content below.
  • Bio
  • Latest Posts
My Twitter profileMy Facebook profileMy Google+ profileMy LinkedIn profile

Jennifer Slegg

Founder & Editor at The SEM Post
Jennifer Slegg is a longtime speaker and expert in search engine marketing, working in the industry for almost 20 years. When she isn't sitting at her desk writing and working, she can be found grabbing a latte at her local Starbucks or planning her next trip to Disneyland. She regularly speaks at Pubcon, SMX, State of Search, Brighton SEO and more, and has been presenting at conferences for over a decade.
My Twitter profileMy Facebook profileMy Google+ profileMy LinkedIn profile

Latest posts by Jennifer Slegg (see all)

  • 2022 Update for Google Quality Rater Guidelines – Big YMYL Updates - August 1, 2022
  • Google Quality Rater Guidelines: The Low Quality 2021 Update - October 19, 2021
  • Rethinking Affiliate Sites With Google’s Product Review Update - April 23, 2021
  • New Google Quality Rater Guidelines, Update Adds Emphasis on Needs Met - October 16, 2020
  • Google Updates Experiment Statistics for Quality Raters - October 6, 2020

Filed Under: Google Tagged With: Google, https, SSL

Sign up for our newsletter


Comments

  1. Scott says

    August 11, 2014 at 9:21 pm

    So yeah, this untrackable link network wasn’t so untrackable after all. I lost 5 sites to what I assume is this, but thank god they were throwaway with $5 articles from India and not my real money makers.

    Lucky for them I guess with Matt Cutts on break, he won’t out which network it was, but yeah, sucks for me. I won’t use them again if they come up with something even more (gasp) untrackable.

  2. Jalinda says

    August 12, 2014 at 8:52 am

    How did Google not plan for the mad rush of EVERYONE (and their freakin dog) switching over in a short period and think about the issues. I am stuck in SSL nightmare on 3 different clients. I am only their SEO and their IT or web host did the SSL certificates, but now I am looking terrible since we are losing traffic and rankings and it is not even my fault.

  3. Jalinda says

    August 12, 2014 at 8:54 am

    And their guidelines could have been a bit more descriptive, I think the IT guy for one client read an ehow article on how to switch a site to SSL.

Trackbacks

  1. SearchCap: Google Weekend Update, Rogue Google Ads Settlement & Our New Site says:
    August 11, 2014 at 2:05 pm

    […] Is the Google update mostly SSL implementation issues?, The SEM Post […]

  2. Explainer: How Google's New SSL / HTTPS Ranking Factor Works says:
    August 13, 2014 at 10:03 am

    […] documented the troubles over here if you want to see more details and Dave Naylor and Jennifer Slegg also go through the […]

Founder & Editor

Jennifer Slegg (2052)

Sign up for our daily news recap & weekly newsletter.


Follow us online

  • Facebook
  • Google+
  • Linkedin
  • Pinterest
  • Twitter

Latest News

2022 Update for Google Quality Rater Guidelines – Big YMYL Updates

We finally have the first Google Quality Rater Guidelines update of 2022, and like usual, it is … [Read More...]

Recent Posts

  • 2022 Update for Google Quality Rater Guidelines – Big YMYL Updates
  • Google Quality Rater Guidelines: The Low Quality 2021 Update
  • Rethinking Affiliate Sites With Google’s Product Review Update
  • New Google Quality Rater Guidelines, Update Adds Emphasis on Needs Met
  • Google Updates Experiment Statistics for Quality Raters
  • Analyzing “How Google Search Works” Changes from Google
  • Google Quality Rater Guidelines Update: New Introduction, Rater Bias & Political Affiliations
  • Google Updates Quality Rater Guidelines: Reputation for News Sites; Video Content Updates; Quality for Information Sites
  • Google Makes Major Changes to NoFollow, Adds Sponsored & UGC Tags
  • Google Updates Quality Rater Guidelines Targeting E-A-T, Page Quality & Interstitials

Categories

  • Affiliate Marketing
  • Amazon
  • Apple
  • Bing
  • Branding
  • Browsers
  • Chrome
  • Content Marketing
  • Design
  • Domains
  • DuckDuckGo
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Firefox
  • Foursquare
  • Google
    • Analytics
    • Google RankBrain
    • Quality Rater's Guidelines
  • History of Search
  • Industry Spotlight
  • Instagram
  • Internet Explorer
  • Links
  • Local
  • Mobile
  • Native Advertising
  • Other Search Engines
  • Pay Per Click
  • Pinterest
  • Publishers
  • Security
  • SEO
  • Snapchat
  • Social Media
  • State of the Industry
  • The SEM Post
  • Tools
  • Twitter
  • Uncategorized
  • User Experience
  • Video Marketing
  • Week in Review
  • Whitepapers
  • Wordpress
  • Yahoo
  • Yelp
  • YouTube
February 2023
MTWTFSS
« Aug  
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728 

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org

Copyright © 2023 · News Pro Theme On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in