There has been a lot of debate on the issue of 301 versus 302 redirects over the years, specifically regarding the loss of PageRank. Gary Illyes from Google has confirmed now that when you are using a 30x redirect – such as a 301 (permanent), 302 (temporary) or 307 (temporary) redirect – that the destination page will not lose PageRank from the intial page.
30x redirects don't lose PageRank anymore.
— Gary Illyes (@methode) July 26, 2016
In today’s hangout, John Mueller also confirmed this has been in place for a while, so this isn’t “new” per se, and does confirm what Mueller has said recently about it not mattering whether a site owner uses a 301 or 302 redirect when it comes to PageRank value.
Gary Illyes also said earlier this year that website owners should use the redirect that is the best choice for their site, and Google had also confirmed that moving to HTTPS would not result in PageRank loss.
Jennifer Slegg
Latest posts by Jennifer Slegg (see all)
- Receive Guest Blog Post Spam Requests? Report Them to Google - May 26, 2017
- Google Warns Against Link Building Via Articles & Guest Posts - May 26, 2017
- Google AdWords Aims to Increase AMP Publisher Revenue with New AMP Ads Conversion - May 24, 2017
- Google Adds Reporting Flag to Local “Check the Facts” Feature - May 23, 2017
- Google Tests Blue Versus Black Sitelinks in Mobile Search - May 23, 2017
Charles Taylor says
Despite what G says, it does still matter, if you use a 302 redirect (like my company uses by default) the old URL stays in the index. I’m sure there are a bunch of other similar back-end crawling issues. I’d recommend sticking with the “best practice” of using the 301 unless circumstances deem otherwise. Thanks for the article!
Bill Hunt says
I suggest people use this with caution as there are other implocations. For example using a 302 Google will kerp and display the old URL but transfer value to new pages. This can be confusing to users if you change domains, categories or http to https and yhe old version shows in SERPS. Note the do this because they expect you to return to the original URL at some point.
Dixon Jones says
That is interesting to know, although I am far from convinced it is the best way to create the best results. Majestic has no immediate plans to emulate that in its own Trust Flow calculations. As far as I am aware, we do not pass Flow Metrics through a 302 and DO “MOSTLY” pass Flow Metrics through a 301. There is a significant section of the SEO community that set up 301 daisy chains and after a while this should be a decreasing signal of quality (and probably an increasing signal of manipulation). So I am happy Majestic is going its own way. I don’t know how many people care, but I thought I would share.
Dixon (Majestic.com)
Ewan Kennedy says
Gary Illyes’ and John Mulller’s comments are both specifically limited to PageRank and neither of them (at least not in the quoted extracts above) has said that it doesn’t matter from any other point of view so one still needs carefully to observe the distinction.