There has been a tweet by Tom Scott making the rounds with over 12,000 retweets, alerting users that anytime you reply to promoted tweet – even with just heckling – the advertiser gets charged.
I just found out that replying to a promoted tweet, even just with heckling, costs the promoter between 50¢ and $5. Use that as you will.
— Tom Scott (@tomscott) August 1, 2014
For those who don’t use Twitter ads, he is correct. From the pricing for Twitter ads page:
You’ll only be charged when people follow your Promoted Account or retweet, reply, favorite or click on your Promoted Tweets. You’ll never be charged for your organic activity on Twitter.
In theory, charging advertisers based on engagement is a good thing, since you don’t need to pay when someone merely sees your ad in their feed. You get the added bonus of building brand awareness simply from all those people seeing your brand even without engagement. Someone else made a suggestion for running up a brand’s ad budget by simply favoriting the tweet for a “silent and costly” charge to the advertiser.
However, many advertisers won’t be happy about paying for those who are replying as hecklers or who are replying for the sole purpose of driving up the advertisers ad costs, when they have no intention of engaging in a legitimate way. While paying for invalid clicks on any platform is just part of doing business, paying to be heckled will leave many Twitter advertisers pretty unhappy.
Does Twitter have filters to prevent this kind of fake engagement? It is hard to say. A case could be made that “any engagement is good engagement”, playing off the old “any publicity is good publicity.” And it is unclear if advertisers could get refunds from non-legitimate clicks, as their Twitter ad documentation doesn’t detail a process for getting refunds from any type of ad issues. But with the price of some Twitter ads, you can only imagine that some brands will be annoyed if they are getting replies that are variations of “F off” or “Your company sucks.”
If you find your ads being engaged by hecklers, keep track of it and ask your account rep or support if they can be refunded. But this would only work for invalid @replies and not the “silent but costly” favoriting. However, if Twitter refuses to refund, you might want to consider suspending Twitter ads until Twitter agrees to solve the problem or come up with a suitable refund plan for non-legitimate engagement.
Jennifer Slegg
Latest posts by Jennifer Slegg (see all)
- Analyzing “How Google Search Works” Changes from Google - July 8, 2020
- Google Quality Rater Guidelines Update: New Introduction, Rater Bias & Political Affiliations - December 6, 2019
- Google Updates Quality Rater Guidelines: Reputation for News Sites; Video Content Updates; Quality for Information Sites - September 13, 2019
- Google Makes Major Changes to NoFollow, Adds Sponsored & UGC Tags - September 10, 2019
- Google Updates Quality Rater Guidelines Targeting E-A-T, Page Quality & Interstitials - May 17, 2019
Sam Mazaheri says
Great post Jennifer, This is a serious flaw in Twitter Ads, but one I think they’ll have to address soon. Twitter needs to let us bid per engagement type to mitigate this. Once they do, I suspect advertisers will be able to justify their Twitter ad spend and ramp up their Twitter campaigns.
Jennifer Slegg says
I have been lucky that none of the campaigns I have run have fallen victim to this, but I can see how with some brands – especially ones people love to hate, that this will become a major issue and drive those advertisers away.