• About Us
  • Contributors
  • Guides
  • Speaking Engagements
  • Write for The SEM Post
  • Submit a tip or contact us!
  • Newsletters

The SEM Post

Latest News About SEO, SEM, PPC & Search Engines

  • Google
  • SEO
  • Mobile
  • Local
  • Bing
  • Pay Per Click
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • State of the Industry
You are here: Home / Twitter / Twitter Advertisers Beware of Non-Legitimate Clicks & Engagement

Twitter Advertisers Beware of Non-Legitimate Clicks & Engagement

August 4, 2014 at 6:30 am PST By Jennifer Slegg

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
  • WhatsApp
  • Evernote
  • SMS

twitter invalidThere has been a tweet by Tom Scott making the rounds with over 12,000 retweets, alerting users that anytime you reply to promoted tweet – even with just heckling – the advertiser gets charged.

I just found out that replying to a promoted tweet, even just with heckling, costs the promoter between 50¢ and $5. Use that as you will.

— Tom Scott (@tomscott) August 1, 2014

For those who don’t use Twitter ads, he is correct.  From the pricing for Twitter ads page:

You’ll only be charged when people follow your Promoted Account or retweet, reply, favorite or click on your Promoted Tweets. You’ll never be charged for your organic activity on Twitter.

In theory, charging advertisers based on engagement is a good thing, since you don’t need to pay when someone merely sees your ad in their feed.  You get the added bonus of building brand awareness simply from all those people seeing your brand even without engagement.  Someone else made a suggestion for running up a brand’s ad budget by simply favoriting the tweet for a “silent and costly” charge to the advertiser.

However, many advertisers won’t be happy about paying for those who are replying as hecklers or who are replying for the sole purpose of driving up the advertisers ad costs, when they have no intention of engaging in a legitimate way.  While paying for invalid clicks on any platform is just part of doing business, paying to be heckled will leave many Twitter advertisers pretty unhappy.

Does Twitter have filters to prevent this kind of fake engagement?  It is hard to say.  A case could be made that “any engagement is good engagement”, playing off the old “any publicity is good publicity.”  And it is unclear if advertisers could get refunds from non-legitimate clicks, as their Twitter ad documentation doesn’t detail a process for getting refunds from any type of ad issues.  But with the price of some Twitter ads, you can only imagine that some brands will be annoyed if they are getting replies that are variations of “F off” or “Your company sucks.”

If you find your ads being engaged by hecklers, keep track of it and ask your account rep or support if they can be refunded.  But this would only work for invalid @replies and not the “silent but costly” favoriting.  However, if Twitter refuses to refund, you might want to consider suspending Twitter ads until Twitter agrees to solve the problem or come up with a suitable refund plan for non-legitimate engagement.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
  • WhatsApp
  • Evernote
  • SMS
The following two tabs change content below.
  • Bio
  • Latest Posts
My Twitter profileMy Facebook profileMy Google+ profileMy LinkedIn profile

Jennifer Slegg

Founder & Editor at The SEM Post
Jennifer Slegg is a longtime speaker and expert in search engine marketing, working in the industry for almost 20 years. When she isn't sitting at her desk writing and working, she can be found grabbing a latte at her local Starbucks or planning her next trip to Disneyland. She regularly speaks at Pubcon, SMX, State of Search, Brighton SEO and more, and has been presenting at conferences for over a decade.
My Twitter profileMy Facebook profileMy Google+ profileMy LinkedIn profile

Latest posts by Jennifer Slegg (see all)

  • Google Quality Rater Guidelines: The Low Quality 2021 Update - October 19, 2021
  • Rethinking Affiliate Sites With Google’s Product Review Update - April 23, 2021
  • New Google Quality Rater Guidelines, Update Adds Emphasis on Needs Met - October 16, 2020
  • Google Updates Experiment Statistics for Quality Raters - October 6, 2020
  • Analyzing “How Google Search Works” Changes from Google - July 8, 2020

Filed Under: Twitter Tagged With: invalid clicks, Twitter, twitter ads

Sign up for our newsletter


Comments

  1. Sam Mazaheri says

    August 4, 2014 at 11:47 am

    Great post Jennifer, This is a serious flaw in Twitter Ads, but one I think they’ll have to address soon. Twitter needs to let us bid per engagement type to mitigate this. Once they do, I suspect advertisers will be able to justify their Twitter ad spend and ramp up their Twitter campaigns.

    • Jennifer Slegg says

      August 4, 2014 at 1:26 pm

      I have been lucky that none of the campaigns I have run have fallen victim to this, but I can see how with some brands – especially ones people love to hate, that this will become a major issue and drive those advertisers away.

Trackbacks

  1. Twitter's Biggest Advertising Problem & Why It Hurts Marketers - The SEM Post says:
    August 5, 2014 at 7:42 am

    […] apps – such as a tile specifically for Flipboard.  Of course, Twitter is also having to solve other advertising problems […]

  2. Best of SEM - Week in Review August 10, 2014 - The SEM Post says:
    August 11, 2014 at 1:10 am

    […] Twitter Advertisers Beware of Non-Legitimate Clicks & Engagement […]

Founder & Editor

Jennifer Slegg (2051)

Sign up for our daily news recap & weekly newsletter.


Follow us online

  • Facebook
  • Google+
  • Linkedin
  • Pinterest
  • Twitter

Latest News

Google Quality Rater Guidelines: The Low Quality 2021 Update

Google has released a new version of the Google quality rater guidelines, a year after the last … [Read More...]

Recent Posts

  • Google Quality Rater Guidelines: The Low Quality 2021 Update
  • Rethinking Affiliate Sites With Google’s Product Review Update
  • New Google Quality Rater Guidelines, Update Adds Emphasis on Needs Met
  • Google Updates Experiment Statistics for Quality Raters
  • Analyzing “How Google Search Works” Changes from Google
  • Google Quality Rater Guidelines Update: New Introduction, Rater Bias & Political Affiliations
  • Google Updates Quality Rater Guidelines: Reputation for News Sites; Video Content Updates; Quality for Information Sites
  • Google Makes Major Changes to NoFollow, Adds Sponsored & UGC Tags
  • Google Updates Quality Rater Guidelines Targeting E-A-T, Page Quality & Interstitials
  • Google Local Service Ads Display Pricing Estimates for Specific Locations

Categories

  • Affiliate Marketing
  • Amazon
  • Apple
  • Bing
  • Branding
  • Browsers
  • Chrome
  • Content Marketing
  • Design
  • Domains
  • DuckDuckGo
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Firefox
  • Foursquare
  • Google
    • Analytics
    • Google RankBrain
    • Quality Rater's Guidelines
  • History of Search
  • Industry Spotlight
  • Instagram
  • Internet Explorer
  • Links
  • Local
  • Mobile
  • Native Advertising
  • Other Search Engines
  • Pay Per Click
  • Pinterest
  • Publishers
  • Security
  • SEO
  • Snapchat
  • Social Media
  • State of the Industry
  • The SEM Post
  • Tools
  • Twitter
  • Uncategorized
  • User Experience
  • Video Marketing
  • Week in Review
  • Whitepapers
  • Wordpress
  • Yahoo
  • Yelp
  • YouTube
May 2022
MTWTFSS
« Oct  
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031 

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org

Copyright © 2022 · News Pro Theme On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in