• About Us
  • Contributors
  • Guides
  • Speaking Engagements
  • Write for The SEM Post
  • Submit a tip or contact us!
  • Newsletters

The SEM Post

Latest News About SEO, SEM, PPC & Search Engines

  • Google
  • SEO
  • Mobile
  • Local
  • Bing
  • Pay Per Click
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • State of the Industry
You are here: Home / Bing / The Hidden Danger of the Search Partner Network

The Hidden Danger of the Search Partner Network

August 25, 2015 at 6:38 am PST By Steven Plimmer

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
  • WhatsApp
  • Evernote
  • SMS

steven plimmmer search partner networkEven if you’ve advertised on Google AdWords for some time (and Bing Ads), you may not be familiar or fully understand the issue of the Partner Networks and how much they can affect your pay per click account performance.

There are times when you may feel overall performance has worsened, for example, but the reality may be that you have received more traffic from the Partner Network than before and so the top level average has been lowered.

steve plimmer memeWhen you are in AdWords you can segment the data by network and this will open your eyes to how different the traffic performs from the Partner Network vs Google properties. The Partner Network is an unknown set of sites and software that both allow users to perform Google searches but also see ads served by AdWords.

Things to Know

Here are some important facts to understand about the Partner Network:

  • They are all kinds of sites and you cannot filter them.
  • They will display results and ads in a number of different ways – so “position 1” could look very different from one place to another. Plus there could be all kinds of other advertising “noise” on the page like banners.
  • They do not use any ad extensions like Sitelinks.
  • They have fewer ads per SERP, typically.
  • You will never know who they all are.
  • You cannot have a campaign that only targets them but you can remove Partner sites entirely.
  • You cannot bid differently for Partner sites.

Options and Ideas

So this being the situation, what do you do? Well, the setting for toggling Partners on or off is at the campaign level, so you can’t even be that granular for this lever. Therefore, you just need to review each campaign and see how the Partners Network performs and pause accordingly.

You will probably find that CTR is much lower than Google sites – often a third or less – and CPCs are also a bit lower. They do convert but normally at a lower rate and rarely contribute more than about 10% of total conversions so if the lower efficiency is bad enough for you to pause them, that is the option open to you.

One experiment for your account worth trying is setting up two identical campaigns (or copying an existing one) with everything the same except one excludes Partners and one includes them. The one that includes them should have 30% lower bids than the campaign that excludes them. The theory is that the vast majority of direct Google searches will be served ads from the original campaign with Partners excluded and the Partner campaign will constitute almost exclusively Partner traffic. This is a possible way to get control of your bidding for this lower-quality traffic.

Conclusion

Although the Partners on Google and BingAds are not necessarily killing your account, they could be having a strong enough effect on your numbers to take a second look and assess how you manage this challenging aspect of SEM.

Don’t rush into anything, thoroughly review the data and take granular decisions rather than blanket ones. If you’re campaigns have a capped budget and you’re hitting it, the simple act of turning off the Partners network could notably improve your KPIs but only if the data supports this.

It’s one of the big frustrations common to the main SEM platforms that you have so little room to maneuver on the Partner Sites but hopefully, this post has given you food for thought. Have you had any big successes with an innovative strategy for Partner Network traffic? Feel free to comment and let us know.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
  • WhatsApp
  • Evernote
  • SMS
The following two tabs change content below.
  • Bio
  • Latest Posts
My Twitter profileMy Google+ profileMy LinkedIn profile

Steven Plimmer

Senior Account Manager & Analyst at ESV Digital
With a decade of PPC experience, Steve hails from the UK and has been with ESV Digital since 2011 but has been working in the US for them as Lead US Analyst and Senior Account Supervisor since 2013. When not building Excel templates, and the like, he is either absorbed in all kinds of subjects from science, current affairs, technology and the arts or he’s traveling.
My Twitter profileMy Google+ profileMy LinkedIn profile

Latest posts by Steven Plimmer (see all)

  • Drive Sales With These 12 PPC Remarketing Tactics - May 2, 2016
  • CRO: Frame Your Customers’ Choices to Maximize Revenue - April 1, 2016
  • In PPC, What Was True Then May Not Be True Now - February 11, 2016
  • 5 Great Ways to Customize Your SEM Ads to Your Audience - January 15, 2016
  • PPC: When To Automate And When Not To Automate - December 4, 2015

Filed Under: Bing, Google, Pay Per Click Tagged With: Search Partner Network

Sign up for our newsletter


Comments

  1. Martin Roettgerding says

    August 25, 2015 at 6:59 am

    Hey Steven,

    Nice to see someone picking up on search partners again! Actually there are a few ways to control search partners on AdWords. While you cannot use bid modifiers manually, Google’s real time bidding solutions (like CPA bidding) take partner sites into account and are able to tailor bids accordingly.

    You can also target a few search partners individually by carefully selecting the right keywords. I once wrote a comprehensive guide on the subject: http://www.ppc-epiphany.com/2012/04/02/targeting-search-partners/

    It’s not exactly easy to deal with them, though… only recommended for advertisers who have gotten everything else out of their accounts and don’t want to call it a day yet 🙂

  2. MamboMan says

    August 25, 2015 at 10:10 am

    non-branded ad groups/keywords typically have a VPC of 2 on partner sites.

    That’s MUCH lower than on non-partners.

    Send a message…turn ’em off! 😛

  3. Affan Laghari says

    August 25, 2015 at 6:34 pm

    Another important thing to keep in mind is that many a times, sites in the Search Partner networks are not search engines at all. They may be using Google’s custom search engine or have their own and the user might have gotten to that page by navigation rather than by searching. Look out for very long search queries sending lot of traffic from Search Partner sites.

  4. mvarga says

    August 25, 2015 at 11:27 pm

    I use partner search sites only for branded KW….

Trackbacks

  1. SearchCap: Cortana On Tap, Google Map Maker Expands & Google Mobile Image Search says:
    August 25, 2015 at 2:01 pm

    […] The Hidden Danger of the Search Partner Network, thesempost.com […]

Founder & Editor

Jennifer Slegg (2049)

Sign up for our daily news recap & weekly newsletter.


Follow us online

  • Facebook
  • Google+
  • Linkedin
  • Pinterest
  • Twitter

Latest News

New Google Quality Rater Guidelines, Update Adds Emphasis on Needs Met

Google has released a brand-new Google quality rater guidelines, coming close to a year after the … [Read More...]

Recent Posts

  • New Google Quality Rater Guidelines, Update Adds Emphasis on Needs Met
  • Google Updates Experiment Statistics for Quality Raters
  • Analyzing “How Google Search Works” Changes from Google
  • Google Quality Rater Guidelines Update: New Introduction, Rater Bias & Political Affiliations
  • Google Updates Quality Rater Guidelines: Reputation for News Sites; Video Content Updates; Quality for Information Sites
  • Google Makes Major Changes to NoFollow, Adds Sponsored & UGC Tags
  • Google Updates Quality Rater Guidelines Targeting E-A-T, Page Quality & Interstitials
  • Google Local Service Ads Display Pricing Estimates for Specific Locations
  • Google Testing “Relevant History” Section in Mobile Search Results
  • Google Converts PDFs, DOCs, XLS etc into HTML for Indexing

Categories

  • Affiliate Marketing
  • Amazon
  • Apple
  • Bing
  • Branding
  • Browsers
  • Chrome
  • Content Marketing
  • Design
  • Domains
  • DuckDuckGo
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Firefox
  • Foursquare
  • Google
    • Analytics
    • Google RankBrain
    • Quality Rater's Guidelines
  • History of Search
  • Industry Spotlight
  • Instagram
  • Internet Explorer
  • Links
  • Local
  • Mobile
  • Native Advertising
  • Other Search Engines
  • Pay Per Click
  • Pinterest
  • Publishers
  • Security
  • SEO
  • Snapchat
  • Social Media
  • State of the Industry
  • The SEM Post
  • Tools
  • Twitter
  • Uncategorized
  • User Experience
  • Video Marketing
  • Week in Review
  • Whitepapers
  • Wordpress
  • Yahoo
  • Yelp
  • YouTube
January 2021
MTWTFSS
« Oct  
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org

Copyright © 2021 · News Pro Theme On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in